Virtual Journal Club

Please note: This website is for discussion purposes only. The information provided at this website is not intended to provide treatment advice, or to diagnose or treat any medical disorder. The creator of this website is not responsible for events that occur as a result of decisions made based on the information presented here.

Citations powered by PubMed

Entries Tagged as 'Semin Musculoskelet Radiol'

Radionuclide imaging of musculoskeletal infection: conventional agents.

July 5th, 2008 · Start a Discussion

Related Articles

Radionuclide imaging of musculoskeletal infection: conventional agents.

Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2007 Dec;11(4):335-52

Authors: Palestro CJ, Love C

The diagnosis of musculoskeletal infection can be clinically challenging, and radionuclide imaging is often performed as part of the diagnostic workup. Conventional studies include bone scan, gallium imaging, and labeled leukocyte imaging. No single test is equally efficacious in all situations, and thus the procedure(s) performed should be optimized for the individual patient. Three-phase bone imaging, readily available and relatively inexpensive, is very accurate in unviolated bone. In the setting of underlying osseous abnormalities, however, the specificity of the test decreases. Four-phase bone, sequential bone/gallium, and labeled leukocyte imaging all have been used in an effort to enhance specificity. Labeled leukocyte imaging is the radionuclide procedure of choice for diagnosing so-called complicating osteomyelitis such as infected joint prostheses, diabetic pedal osteomyelitis, and infection of the neuropathic joint. To maximize the accuracy of the study, complementary bone marrow imaging often must be performed. Labeled leukocyte imaging is of limited value in spinal osteomyelitis, however, because this entity often presents as a nonspecific photopenic defect on white cell studies. The conventional radionuclide study for evaluating spinal osteomyelitis is gallium imaging, which should be performed regardless of the findings on a contemporaneous bone scan. The reasons for this are as follows: Gallium improves the specificity of the bone scan; gallium detects accompanying soft tissue infection, whereas the bone scan does not, and gallium may be more sensitive than the bone scan in elderly patients.

PMID: 18324598 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

[Read more →]

Tags: Semin Musculoskelet Radiol

PET/CT in musculoskeletal infection.

July 5th, 2008 · Start a Discussion

Related Articles

PET/CT in musculoskeletal infection.

Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2007 Dec;11(4):353-64

Authors: Strobel K, Stumpe KD

Early diagnosis of musculoskeletal infections is the key to successful therapy and prevention of complications. Fluorine-18 (F-18) fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is a promising modality for imaging musculoskeletal infection and might play an important role in the evaluation of chronic osteomyelitis and spinal infection. FDG-PET has shown promising results for diagnosing both acute and chronic infection of the axial and appendicular skeletons. PET imaging will have increased importance in patients with metallic implants because FDG uptake, in contrast to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), is not hampered by metallic artifacts. In patients with suspected prosthetic joint infection, results of PET are controversial, and combined indium-111-labeled leukocyte and technetium-99m-sulfur colloid marrow scintigraphy still remains the gold standard. PET/CT with the combination of PET and a low-dose or full-dose diagnostic CT provides exact anatomical correlation of bone and joint lesions and increases the accuracy of the test compared with PET alone. The question of in which situations PET/CT becomes the preferred imaging method in suspected musculoskeletal infection depends on several factors, including cost and availability. This article reviews the currently available literature and addresses the use of FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal infections.

PMID: 18324599 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

[Read more →]

Tags: Semin Musculoskelet Radiol