Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic treatment of respiratory tract infections in a primary care setting: are we there yet?

Prim Care Respir J. 2011 Dec;20(4):360-7

Authors: Aabenhus R, Jensen JU

Abstract
Clinical signs of infection do not allow for correct identification of bacterial and viral aetiology in acute respiratory infections. A valid tool to assist the clinician in identifying patients who will benefit from antibiotic therapy, as well as patients with a potentially serious infection, could greatly improve patient care and limit excessive antibiotic prescriptions. Procalcitonin is a new marker of suspected bacterial infection that has shown promise in guiding antibiotic therapy in acute respiratory tract infections in hospitals without compromising patient safety. Procalcitonin concentrations in primary care are low and can be used primarily to rule out serious infection. However, procalcitonin measurement should not be used as the sole basis for clinical decisions; clinical skills are prerequisites for the correct use of this new tool in practice. At present there is no point-of-care test for procalcitonin with acceptable precision, severely hampering its application in primary care. This article reviews the physiology of procalcitonin, describes the assays available for its measurement, evaluates the present evidence from primary care on its use to identify correctly patients who are likely to benefit from antibiotic treatment and to rule out serious infections, and comments on further research to determine a future role for procalcitonin in primary care.

PMID: 21808938 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Primary care summary of the British Thoracic Society Guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults: 2009 update. Endorsed by the Royal College of General Practitioners and the Primary Care Respiratory Society UK.

Prim Care Respir J. 2010 Mar;19(1):21-7

Authors: Levy ML, Le Jeune I, Woodhead MA, Macfarlaned JT, Lim WS,

INTRODUCTION: The identification and management of adults presenting with pneumonia is a major challenge for primary care health professionals. This paper summarises the key recommendations of the British Thoracic Society (BTS) Guidelines for the management of Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) in adults. METHOD: Systematic electronic database searches were conducted in order to identify potentially relevant studies that might inform guideline recommendations. Generic study appraisal checklists and an evidence grading from A+ to D were used to indicate the strength of the evidence upon which recommendations were made. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides definitions, key messages, and recommendations for handling the uncertainty surrounding the clinical diagnosis, assessing severity, management, and follow-up of patients with CAP in the community setting. Diagnosis and decision on hospital referral in primary care is based on clinical judgement and the CRB-65 score. Unlike some other respiratory infections (e.g. acute bronchitis) an antibiotic is always indicated when a clinical diagnosis of pneumonia is made. Timing of initial review will be determined by disease severity. When there is a delay in symptom or radiographic resolution beyond six weeks, the main concern is whether the CAP was a complication of an underlying condition such as lung cancer.

PMID: 20157684 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Patient-level pooled analysis of the effect of tiotropium on COPD exacerbations and related hospitalisations.

Prim Care Respir J. 2009 Jun;18(2):106-13

Authors: Halpin D, Menjoge S, Viel K

AIM: To assess the effect of tiotropium 18 mcg once daily on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations and exacerbation-related hospitalisations using a patient-level pooled analysis. METHODS: All completed randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group tiotropium trials with a duration of >or=24 weeks were included (n=9). An exacerbation was defined in each study as >or=2 respiratory symptoms lasting >or=3 days, and requiring treatment with antibiotics and/or systemic steroids and/or hospitalisation. RESULTS: Compared with placebo (2,862 patients), tiotropium (3,309 patients) significantly reduced by 21% both the risk of COPD exacerbation (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.86; p<0.0001) and the risk of exacerbation-associated hospitalisation (95% CI 0.65-0.96; p=0.015). Time to first exacerbation and first associated hospitalisation were increased. The protective effect of tiotropium was consistent regardless of age, gender, inhaled corticosteroid use and disease severity. CONCLUSION: This analysis provides further confirmatory evidence that tiotropium reduces the risk of exacerbation and associated hospitalisation.

PMID: 19407916 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Bronchodilator efficacy of tiotropium in patients with mild to moderate COPD.

Prim Care Respir J. 2008 Sep;17(3):169-75

Authors: Johansson G, Lindberg A, Romberg K, Nordström L, Gerken F, Roquet A

AIMS: Evaluation of tiotropium efficacy in patients with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) defined by the 2003 Swedish Society of Respiratory Medicine guidelines (post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <70%; FEV1 >60% predicted). METHODS: In this 12-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tiotropium 18 mcg once daily versus placebo, respiratory function was assessed on Days 1, 15 and 85 (baseline: pre-dose Day 1). RESULTS: Mean+/-SD baseline FEV1 (% predicted) was 73.4+/-12.5 (tiotropium, n=107; placebo, n=117). Tiotropium significantly improved change from baseline in area under the curve from pre-dose to 2 hours post-dose (AUC0-2 h) FEV1 versus placebo, by 166+/-26 mL (mean+/-SE) at study end (p<0.0001). With tiotropium, there were significant increases in the change in AUC0-2 h FVC versus baseline, and trough FEV1 and FVC, versus placebo, on all test days (p<0.01). Adverse event rates were similar. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, tiotropium improved lung function in patients with mild COPD.

PMID: 18536860 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]