Virtual Journal Club

Please note: This website is for discussion purposes only. The information provided at this website is not intended to provide treatment advice, or to diagnose or treat any medical disorder. The creator of this website is not responsible for events that occur as a result of decisions made based on the information presented here.

Citations powered by PubMed

Entries Tagged as 'Med Mal Infect'

Audit of antibiotic therapy used in 66 cases of endocarditis.

April 15th, 2012 · Start a Discussion

Audit of antibiotic therapy used in 66 cases of endocarditis.
Med Mal Infect. 201…

[Read more →]

Tags: Med Mal Infect

Emergence of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus identified in the Tlemcen university hospital (North-West Algeria).

April 15th, 2012 · Start a Discussion

Emergence of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus identified in the Tlemcen univers…

[Read more →]

Tags: Med Mal Infect

Impact of an assisted reassessment of antibiotic therapies on the quality of prescriptions in an intensive care unit.

January 18th, 2012 · Start a Discussion

Impact of an assisted reassessment of antibiotic therapies on the quality of prescription…

[Read more →]

Tags: Med Mal Infect

Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin for hospitalized patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections in France.

September 18th, 2009 · Start a Discussion

Related Articles

Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin for hospitalized patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections in France.

Med Mal Infect. 2009 May;39(5):330-40

Authors: De Cock E, Sorensen S, Levrat F, Besnier JM, Dupon M, Guery B, Duttagupta S

Studies have shown similar clinical cure rates and shorter length of hospitalization when using linezolid compared to vancomycin in patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections due to suspected or proven methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). OBJECTIVE: This study had for aim to compare the cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in French healthcare settings. METHOD: A decision-analytic model followed an average patient from the initiation of an empiric treatment until cure, death or second-line treatment failure. A clinical data probability was obtained from clinical trials, resource utilization data (including treatment duration and length of hospitalization) and prevalence of MRSA was obtained from a Delphi panel, and costs from published sources. RESULTS: First-line cure rate for linezolid-treated patients was 90.7% versus 85.5% for vancomycin; the total cure rates after two lines of treatment were 98.5% and 98.0%, respectively. The average total cost was 7,778euro for linezolid versus 8,777euro for vancomycin. The mean estimated length of hospitalization after two lines of treatment was 10.7 days for linezolid versus 13.3 days for vancomycin. The increased effectiveness and reduced cost lead to more frequent prescription. This did not change after one-way sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Linezolid may be considered as a cost-effective treatment for patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections suspected to be MRSA related in France.

PMID: 19304423 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

[Read more →]

Tags: Med Mal Infect