Virtual Journal Club

Please note: This website is for discussion purposes only. The information provided at this website is not intended to provide treatment advice, or to diagnose or treat any medical disorder. The creator of this website is not responsible for events that occur as a result of decisions made based on the information presented here.

Citations powered by PubMed

Entries Tagged as 'JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr'

To Determine a Practical pH Cutoff Level for Reliable Confirmation of Nasogastric Tube Placement.

June 5th, 2011 · Start a Discussion

To Determine a Practical pH Cutoff Level for Reliable Confirmation of Nasogastric Tube Placement.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011 May 27;
Authors: Gilbertson HR, Rogers EJ, Ukoumunne OC
BACKGROUND: Enteral feeding i…

[Read more →]

Tags: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr

Understanding why patients die after gastrostomy tube insertion: a retrospective analysis of mortality.

August 9th, 2009 · Start a Discussion

Related Articles

Understanding why patients die after gastrostomy tube insertion: a retrospective analysis of mortality.

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009 Jul-Aug;33(4):375-9

Authors: Longcroft-Wheaton G, Marden P, Colleypriest B, Gavin D, Taylor G, Farrant M

OBJECTIVES: To understand the causes of mortality of inpatients receiving a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube compared with a survival curve predicted from a model proposed by Levine et al (2007). DESIGN: A retrospective study of patients receiving a PEG over an 18-month period. SETTING: Royal United Hospital Bath, a district general hospital in the southwest of England. PATIENTS: Fifty-five cases, with 44 found eligible for inclusion. INTERVENTIONS: A Levine score was calculated for this cohort. A survival curve after PEG was produced and compared with the Kaplan-Meier curve predicted by the Levine model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality over a period of 1 year. RESULTS: The mortality at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months was 16%, 20%, 25%, and 28%, respectively. This matched the predicted death rate from the Levine model closely (Pearson’s rank correlation coefficient = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: The authors found that the mortality of patients receiving a PEG followed that predicted for a similar cohort of patients without PEGs in the Levine model. This suggests that the deaths observed were due to underlying comorbidities, can provide a baseline for mortality targets for PEG services, and is useful patient information regarding the risks and benefits of the procedure. The findings demonstrate that PEG does no harm and supports the accepted opinion that nutrition support is associated with a better outcome. Furthermore, they show that most deaths occur within the first month of placement and would support arguments for delaying placement until outcome from the underlying condition is more predictable.

PMID: 19339748 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

[Read more →]

Tags: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr