Prospective derivation and validation of early dynamic model for predicting outcome in pa…
Entries Tagged as 'Gut'
Prospective derivation and validation of early dynamic model for predicting outcome in patients with acute liver failure.
February 18th, 2012 · Start a Discussion
Tags: Gut
Randomised placebo-controlled trial of rituximab (anti-CD20) in active ulcerative colitis.
January 19th, 2012 · Start a Discussion
Randomised placebo-controlled trial of rituximab (anti-CD20) in active ulcerative colitis…
Tags: Gut
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: recent guidelines and beyond.
December 10th, 2011 · Start a Discussion
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: recent guidelines and beyond.
Gut. 2011 Dec 6;…
Tags: Gut
Guidelines for the management of iron deficiency anaemia.
May 14th, 2011 · Start a Discussion
Guidelines for the management of iron deficiency anaemia.
Gut. 2011 May 11;
Authors: Goddard AF, James MW, McIntyre AS, Scott BB,
Background Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) occurs in 2-5% of adult men and postmenopausa…
Tags: Gut
Response of unexplained chest pain to proton pump inhibitor treatment in patients with and without objective evidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
April 23rd, 2011 · Start a Discussion
Response of unexplained chest pain to proton pump inhibitor treatment in patients with and without objective evidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
Gut. 2011 Apr 20;
Authors: Kahrilas PJ, Hughes N, Howden CW
In…
Tags: Gut
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, diagnoses and outcomes in the 2007 UK audit.
April 16th, 2011 · Start a Discussion
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, diagnoses and outcomes in the 2007 UK audit.
Gut. 2011 Apr 13;
Authors: Hearnshaw SA, Logan RF, Lowe D, Travis SP, Murphy MF, Palmer KR
Objectiv…
Tags: Gut
Guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults.
April 6th, 2011 · Start a Discussion
Guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults.
Gut. 2011 May;60(5):571-607
Authors: Mowat C, Cole A, Windsor A, Ahmad T, Arnott I, Driscoll R, Mitton S, Orchard T, Rutter M, Younge L, Lees C, Ho GT, Sat…
Tags: Gut
TIPS for the treatment of refractory ascites, hepatorenal syndrome and hepatic hydrothorax: a critical update.
July 27th, 2010 · Start a Discussion
| Related Articles |
TIPS for the treatment of refractory ascites, hepatorenal syndrome and hepatic hydrothorax: a critical update.
Gut. 2010 Jul;59(7):988-1000
Authors: Rössle M, Gerbes AL
Refractory ascites is a frequent complication of advanced cirrhosis and is associated with hepatorenal syndrome and hepatic hydrothorax. Large volume paracentesis and pleurodesis are regarded as first-line treatments in patients who do not respond adequately to diuretics. These treatments, however, do not prevent recurrence and carry the risk of worsening of the circulatory dysfunction leading to hepatorenal syndrome. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been proposed as an alternative to paracentesis. TIPS reduces the rate of ascites recurrence mainly due to the reduction in the filtration pressure. In addition, TIPS results in a positive effect on renal function, including hepatorenal syndrome, demonstrated by a rapid increase in urinary sodium excretion, urinary volume, and improvement in plasma creatinine concentration. Furthermore, plasma renin activity, aldosterone, and noradrenalin concentrations improve gradually after TIPS insertion suggesting a positive effect on systemic underfilling, the factor of hepatorenal syndrome. As demonstrated recently in two meta-analyses including five randomised studies, TIPS also improves survival when compared with paracentesis. However, the evidence is based on relatively few studies with only 305 patients included. The positive effects of the TIPS are opposed by an increased frequency and severity of episodes of hepatic encephalopathy which may be reduced by both patient selection and reduced shunt diameter. Based on the present knowledge the recommended hierarchy of treatments for refractory ascites may be reconsidered upgrading TIPS in suitable candidates.
PMID: 20581246 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Tags: Gut
Combined versus sequential diuretic treatment of ascites in non-azotaemic patients with cirrhosis: results of an open randomised clinical trial.
April 9th, 2010 · Start a Discussion
| Related Articles |
Combined versus sequential diuretic treatment of ascites in non-azotaemic patients with cirrhosis: results of an open randomised clinical trial.
Gut. 2010 Jan;59(1):98-104
Authors: Angeli P, Fasolato S, Mazza E, Okolicsanyi L, Maresio G, Velo E, Galioto A, Salinas F, D’Aquino M, Sticca A, Gatta A
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare sequential versus combined diuretic therapy in patients with cirrhosis, moderate ascites and without renal failure. DESIGN: One hundred patients were randomly assigned to the two diuretic treatments. The sequential treatment provided potassium canrenoate at the initial dose of 200 mg/day, then increased to 400 mg/day. Non-responders were treated with 400 mg/day of potassium canrenoate and furosemide at an initial dose of 50 mg/day, then increased to 150 mg/day. The combined treatment provided the initial dose of 200 mg/day of potassium canrenoate and 50 mg/day of furosemide, then increased to 400 mg/day and 150 mg/day, respectively. RESULTS: Most patients who received sequential treatment responded to potassium canrenoate alone (19% to 200 mg/day and 52.63% to 400 mg/day, respectively). Most patients who received the combined treatment responded to the first two steps (40% to the first step and 50% to the second, ie, 400 mg/day of potassium canrenoate plus 100 mg/day of furosemide). Adverse effects (38% vs 20%, p<0.05), in particular, hyperkalaemia (18% vs 4%, p<0.05), were more frequent in patients who received sequential therapy. As a consequence, the per cent of patients who resolved ascites without changing the effective diuretic step was higher in those who received the combined treatment (56% vs 76%, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The combined diuretic treatment is preferable to the sequential one in the treatment of moderate ascites in patients with cirrhosis and without renal failure. NCT00741663. This work is an open randomised clinical trial.
PMID: 19570764 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Tags: Gut
Low-dose terlipressin plus banding ligation versus low-dose terlipressin alone in the prevention of very early rebleeding of oesophageal varices.
October 21st, 2009 · Start a Discussion
| Related Articles |
Low-dose terlipressin plus banding ligation versus low-dose terlipressin alone in the prevention of very early rebleeding of oesophageal varices.
Gut. 2009 Sep;58(9):1275-80
Authors: Lo GH, Chen WC, Wang HM, Lin CK, Chan HH, Tsai WL, Cheng LC, Yu HC, Tsay FW
BACKGROUND: Very early rebleeding is frequently encountered in patients with acute oesophageal variceal bleeding. A trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety in patients with no active bleeding at endoscopy, receiving banding ligation association with terlipressin to prevent very early rebleeding. METHODS: Patients with no active variceal bleeding at endoscopy were evaluated. Eligible patients were randomised to receive terlipressin infusion alone for 5 days (Terlipressin group) or banding ligation plus terlipressin infusion for 2 days (Combined group). Primary endpoints were treatment failure and very early rebleeding. RESULTS: The terlipressin group was composed of 46 patients and the Combined group was composed of 47 patients. Both groups were comparable in terms of baseline data. Forty-eight-hour haemostasis was achieved in 91% in the Terlipressin group and 98% in the Combined group (p = 0.20). Very early rebleeding within 48-120 h occurred in 7 patients (15%) in the Terlipressin group but not in any patients (0%) in the Combined group (p = 0.006). Treatment failure was 24% in the Terlipressin group and 2% in the Combined group (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed that treatment (OR 0.081; 95% CI 0.010 to 0.627) was the only predictive factor of very early rebleeding. Blood requirement was significantly lower in the Combined group than in the Terlipressin group. Complications and 6-week survival were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of banding ligation and terlipressin infusion for 2 days was superior to only infusion of terlipressin for 5 days in the reduction of very early rebleeding and treatment failure in patients with inactive variceal bleeding at endoscopy. Trial registration number: ISRCTN28353453.
PMID: 19386609 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Tags: Gut
The early prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis: a large population-based study.
February 16th, 2009 · Start a Discussion
| Related Articles |
The early prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis: a large population-based study.
Gut. 2008 Dec;57(12):1698-703
Authors: Wu BU, Johannes RS, Sun X, Tabak Y, Conwell DL, Banks PA
BACKGROUND: Identification of patients at risk for mortality early in the course of acute pancreatitis (AP) is an important step in improving outcome. METHODS: Using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis, a clinical scoring system was developed for prediction of in-hospital mortality in AP. The scoring system was derived on data collected from 17,992 cases of AP from 212 hospitals in 2000-2001. The new scoring system was validated on data collected from 18,256 AP cases from 177 hospitals in 2004-2005. The accuracy of the scoring system for prediction of mortality was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The performance of the new scoring system was further validated by comparing its predictive accuracy with that of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Examination (APACHE) II. RESULTS: CART analysis identified five variables for prediction of in-hospital mortality. One point is assigned for the presence of each of the following during the first 24 h: blood urea nitrogen (BUN) >25 mg/dl; impaired mental status; systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS); age >60 years; or the presence of a pleural effusion (BISAP). Mortality ranged from >20% in the highest risk group to <1% in the lowest risk group. In the validation cohort, the BISAP AUC was 0.82 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.84) versus APACHE II AUC of 0.83 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: A new mortality-based prognostic scoring system for use in AP has been derived and validated. The BISAP is a simple and accurate method for the early identification of patients at increased risk for in-hospital mortality.
PMID: 18519429 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Tags: Gut
Pain in chronic pancreatitis: the role of neuropathic pain mechanisms.
December 30th, 2008 · Start a Discussion
| Related Articles |
Pain in chronic pancreatitis: the role of neuropathic pain mechanisms.
Gut. 2008 Nov;57(11):1616-27
Authors: Drewes AM, Krarup AL, Detlefsen S, Malmstrøm ML, Dimcevski G, Funch-Jensen P
Pain mechanisms in patients with chronic pancreatitis are incompletely understood and probably multifactorial. Recently, evidence from experimental human pain research has indicated that in many of these patients pain processing in the central nervous system is abnormal and mimics that seen in neuropathic pain disorders. The current review focuses on several lines of evidence supporting this hypothesis. Hence, the spontaneous and postprandial pain in chronic pancreatitis may reflect the characteristic pain features seen in patients with neuropathic pain. Biochemical and histopathological findings in tissues from patients with chronic pancreatitis are similar to those observed in patients with other nerve fibre lesions. Experimental studies have shown that patients with chronic pancreatitis show signs of spinal hyper-excitability counter-balanced by segmental and descending inhibition. Changes in the brain with cortical reorganisation to gut stimulation and increased activity in specific electroencephalographic features characteristic for neuropathic pain are also seen in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Finally, principles involved in the treatment of pancreatic pain have many similarities with those recommended in neuropathic pain disorders. In conclusion, a mechanism-based understanding of pain in chronic pancreatitis may have important implications for the treatment.
PMID: 18566105 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Tags: Gut
Needle track seeding following biopsy of liver lesions in the diagnosis of hepatocellular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
December 30th, 2008 · Start a Discussion
| Related Articles |
Needle track seeding following biopsy of liver lesions in the diagnosis of hepatocellular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gut. 2008 Nov;57(11):1592-6
Authors: Silva MA, Hegab B, Hyde C, Guo B, Buckels JA, Mirza DF
BACKGROUND: Needle biopsy of a suspicious liver lesion could guide management in the setting of equivocal imaging and serology, although it is not recommended generally because there is the possibility of tumour dissemination outside the liver. The incidence of needle track seeding following biopsy of a suspicious liver lesion is ill-defined, however. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies published before March 2007 was performed. Studies that reported on needle tract seeding following biopsy of suspicious liver lesions were identified. Lesions suspected of being hepatocelleular cancer (HCC) were considered. Data on the type of needle biopsy, diagnosis, incidence of needle track seeding duration to seeding, follow-up and impact on outcome were tabulated. RESULTS: Eight studies identified by systematic review on biopsy of HCC were included in a meta-analysis. The pooled estimate of a patient with seeding per 100 patients with HCC was 0.027 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.018 to 0.040). There was no difference whether a fixed or random effects model was used. Q was 4.802 with 7 degrees of freedom, p = 0.684; thus the observed heterogeneity was compatible with variation by chance alone. The pooled estimate of a patient with seeding per 100 patients per year was 0.009 (95% CI 0.006 to 0.013), p = 0.686. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review we have shown that the incidence of needle tract tumour seeding following biopsy of a HCC is 2.7% overall, or 0.9% per year.
PMID: 18669577 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Tags: Gut
A meta-analysis of rectal NSAIDs in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
September 5th, 2008 · Start a Discussion
| Related Articles |
A meta-analysis of rectal NSAIDs in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
Gut. 2008 Sep;57(9):1262-7
Authors: Elmunzer BJ, Waljee AK, Elta GH, Taylor JR, Fehmi SM, Higgins PD
BACKGROUND: Several pharmacological agents for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) have been studied. Clinical trials evaluating the protective effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have yielded inconclusive results. AIM: To perform a meta-analysis of studies evaluating the effect of prophylactic rectal NSAIDs on PEP. METHODS: By searching Medline, Embase, meeting abstracts and bibliographies, two independent reviewers systematically identified prospective randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effect of rectally administered prophylactic NSAIDs on the incidence of PEP pancreatitis. A meta-analysis of these clinical trials was performed. RESULTS: Four RCTs, enrolling a total of 912 patients, have been published. Meta-analysis of these studies demonstrates a pooled relative risk for PEP after prophylactic administration of NSAIDs of 0.36 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.60); patients who received NSAIDs in the periprocedural period were 64% less likely to develop pancreatitis and 90% less likely to develop moderate to severe pancreatitis. The pooled number needed to treat with NSAIDs to prevent one episode of pancreatitis is 15 patients. No adverse events attributable to the use of NSAIDs were reported in any of the clinical trials. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, prophylactic NSAIDs were effective in preventing PEP. Widespread prophylactic administration of these agents may significantly reduce the incidence of PEP, resulting in major clinical and economic benefit. Given current scepticism regarding the efficacy of any prophylactic medication for ERCP, additional multicentre studies are needed for confirmation prior to widespread adoption of this strategy.
PMID: 18375470 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Tags: Gut
Pathogenetic mechanisms of hepatic encephalopathy.
August 9th, 2008 · Start a Discussion
| Related Articles |
Pathogenetic mechanisms of hepatic encephalopathy.
Gut. 2008 Aug;57(8):1156-65
Authors: Häussinger D, Schliess F
Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) in liver cirrhosis is a clinical manifestation of a low-grade cerebral oedema, which is exacerbated in response to ammonia and other precipitating factors. This low-grade cerebral oedema is accompanied by an increased production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen oxide species (ROS/RNOS), which trigger multiple protein and RNA modifications, thereby affecting brain function. The action of ammonia, inflammatory cytokines, benzodiazepines and hyponatraemia integrates at the level of astrocyte swelling and oxidative stress. This explains why heterogenous clinical conditions can precipitate HE episodes. Oxidised RNA species, which are formed in response to oxidative stress, also participate in local postsynaptic protein synthesis in neurons, which is required for memory formation. Although the functional consequences of RNA oxidation in this context remain to be established, these findings bear a potential biochemical explanation for the multiple alterations of neurotransmitter receptor systems and of synaptic plasticity. Such changes may in part also underlie the pathologically altered oscillatory networks in the brain of HE patients in vivo, as detected by magnetencephalography. These disturbances of oscillatory networks, which in part are triggered by hypothalamic structures, can explain the motor and cognitive deficits in patients with HE. Current therapeutic strategies aim at the elimination of precipitating factors. The potential of therapies targeting downstream pathophysiological events in HE has not yet been explored, but offers novel potential sites of therapeutic intervention.
PMID: 18628377 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Tags: Gut
