<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virtual Journal Club &#187; Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/category/asian-cardiovasc-thorac-ann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub</link>
	<description>Division of Hospital Medicine Virtual Journal Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:31:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cellular cardiomyoplasty: what have we learned?</title>
		<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2009/09/02/cellular-cardiomyoplasty-what-have-we-learned/</link>
		<comments>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2009/09/02/cellular-cardiomyoplasty-what-have-we-learned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/4c6d1e0b8cc92641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<table border="0" width="100%"><tr><td align="left"><a href="http://asianannals.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&#38;pmid=19515892"><img src="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/corehtml/query/egifs/http:--highwire.stanford.edu-icons-externalservices-pubmed-standard-ascats_full.gif" border="0"></a> </td><td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&#38;cmd=Display&#38;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&#38;from_uid=19515892">Related Articles</a></td></tr></table>
        <p><b>Cellular cardiomyoplasty: what have we learned?</b></p>
        <p>Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2009 Jan;17(1):89-101</p>
        <p>Authors:  Kao RL, Browder W, Li C</p>
        <p>Restoring blood flow, improving perfusion, reducing clinical symptoms, and augmenting ventricular function are the goals after acute myocardial infarction. Other than cardiac transplantation, no standard clinical procedure is available to restore damaged myocardium. Since we first reported cellular cardiomyoplasty in 1989, successful outcomes have been confirmed by experimental and clinical studies, but definitive long-term efficacy requires large-scale placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trials. On meta-analysis, stem cell-treated groups had significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction, reduced infarct scar size, and decreased left ventricular end-systolic volume. Fewer myocardial infarctions, deaths, readmissions for heart failure, and repeat revascularizations were additional benefits. Encouraging clinical findings have been reported using satellite or bone marrow stem cells, but understanding of the benefit mechanisms demands additional studies. Adult mammalian ventricular myocardium lacks adequate regeneration capability, and cellular cardiomyoplasty offers a new way to overcome this; the poor retention and engraftment rate and high apoptotic rate of the implanted stem cells limit outcomes. The ideal type and number of cells, optimal timing of cell therapy, and ideal cell delivery method depend on determining the beneficial mechanisms. Cellular cardiomyoplasty has progressed rapidly in the last decade. A critical review may help us to better plan the future direction.</p>
        <p>PMID: 19515892 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" width="100%"><tr><td align="left"><a href="http://asianannals.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&amp;pmid=19515892"><img src="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/corehtml/query/egifs/http:--highwire.stanford.edu-icons-externalservices-pubmed-standard-ascats_full.gif" border="0"></a> </td><td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Display&amp;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&amp;from_uid=19515892">Related Articles</a></td></tr></table>
        <p><b>Cellular cardiomyoplasty: what have we learned?</b></p>
        <p>Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2009 Jan;17(1):89-101</p>
        <p>Authors:  Kao RL, Browder W, Li C</p>
        <p>Restoring blood flow, improving perfusion, reducing clinical symptoms, and augmenting ventricular function are the goals after acute myocardial infarction. Other than cardiac transplantation, no standard clinical procedure is available to restore damaged myocardium. Since we first reported cellular cardiomyoplasty in 1989, successful outcomes have been confirmed by experimental and clinical studies, but definitive long-term efficacy requires large-scale placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trials. On meta-analysis, stem cell-treated groups had significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction, reduced infarct scar size, and decreased left ventricular end-systolic volume. Fewer myocardial infarctions, deaths, readmissions for heart failure, and repeat revascularizations were additional benefits. Encouraging clinical findings have been reported using satellite or bone marrow stem cells, but understanding of the benefit mechanisms demands additional studies. Adult mammalian ventricular myocardium lacks adequate regeneration capability, and cellular cardiomyoplasty offers a new way to overcome this; the poor retention and engraftment rate and high apoptotic rate of the implanted stem cells limit outcomes. The ideal type and number of cells, optimal timing of cell therapy, and ideal cell delivery method depend on determining the beneficial mechanisms. Cellular cardiomyoplasty has progressed rapidly in the last decade. A critical review may help us to better plan the future direction.</p>
        <p>PMID: 19515892 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2009/09/02/cellular-cardiomyoplasty-what-have-we-learned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Management of malignant pleural effusion associated with trapped lung syndrome.</title>
		<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2008/05/02/management-of-malignant-pleural-effusion-associated-with-trapped-lung-syndrome/</link>
		<comments>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2008/05/02/management-of-malignant-pleural-effusion-associated-with-trapped-lung-syndrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/7972aaaaf04eac4d</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<table border="0" width="100%"><tr><td align="left"><a href="http://asianannals.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&#38;pmid=18381869"><img src="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/egifs/http:--highwire.stanford.edu-icons-externalservices-pubmed-standard-ascats_full.gif" border="0"></a> </td><td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&#38;cmd=Display&#38;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&#38;from_uid=18381869">Related Articles</a></td></tr></table>
        <p><b>Management of malignant pleural effusion associated with trapped lung syndrome.</b></p>
        <p>Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2008 Apr;16(2):120-3</p>
        <p>Authors:  Qureshi RA, Collinson SL, Powell RJ, Froeschle PO, Berrisford RG</p>
        <p>Management of recurrent malignant pleural effusion associated with trapped lung syndrome remains problematic. An alternative treatment using a pleural catheter has been advocated. Between August 1999 and August 2002, 127 patients underwent thoracoscopy for malignant pleural effusion. Of these, 52 (41%) with trapped lung were managed by insertion of a pleural catheter. Mean age was 66 years (range, 42-89 years). The most frequent diagnosis was breast cancer. Spontaneous pleurodesis (drainage &#60; 10 mL) occurred in 25 (48%) patients whose catheter was removed after 30 to 255 days (mean, 93.8 days). Symptomatic relief was achieved in 49 (94%) patients. Mean dyspnea score improved significantly from 3.0 to 1.9. Complications comprised catheter blockage, surgical emphysema, cellulitis, and loculated effusion in 2 patients each. Mean length of hospital stay was 3 days (range, 1-16 days). Median survival was 126 days (range, 10-175 days). We conclude that long-term placement of a pleural catheter provides effective palliation for malignant pleural effusion associated with trapped lung syndrome.</p>
        <p>PMID: 18381869 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" width="100%"><tr><td align="left"><a href="http://asianannals.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&amp;pmid=18381869"><img src="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/egifs/http:--highwire.stanford.edu-icons-externalservices-pubmed-standard-ascats_full.gif" border="0"></a> </td><td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Display&amp;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&amp;from_uid=18381869">Related Articles</a></td></tr></table>
        <p><b>Management of malignant pleural effusion associated with trapped lung syndrome.</b></p>
        <p>Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2008 Apr;16(2):120-3</p>
        <p>Authors:  Qureshi RA, Collinson SL, Powell RJ, Froeschle PO, Berrisford RG</p>
        <p>Management of recurrent malignant pleural effusion associated with trapped lung syndrome remains problematic. An alternative treatment using a pleural catheter has been advocated. Between August 1999 and August 2002, 127 patients underwent thoracoscopy for malignant pleural effusion. Of these, 52 (41%) with trapped lung were managed by insertion of a pleural catheter. Mean age was 66 years (range, 42-89 years). The most frequent diagnosis was breast cancer. Spontaneous pleurodesis (drainage &lt; 10 mL) occurred in 25 (48%) patients whose catheter was removed after 30 to 255 days (mean, 93.8 days). Symptomatic relief was achieved in 49 (94%) patients. Mean dyspnea score improved significantly from 3.0 to 1.9. Complications comprised catheter blockage, surgical emphysema, cellulitis, and loculated effusion in 2 patients each. Mean length of hospital stay was 3 days (range, 1-16 days). Median survival was 126 days (range, 10-175 days). We conclude that long-term placement of a pleural catheter provides effective palliation for malignant pleural effusion associated with trapped lung syndrome.</p>
        <p>PMID: 18381869 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2008/05/02/management-of-malignant-pleural-effusion-associated-with-trapped-lung-syndrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
