A Hospital’s Adoption of Information Technology Is Associated With Altered Risks of Hospi…

[Read more →]

It’s the writing on the wall: Whiteboards improve inpatient satisfaction with provider communication.
Am J Med Qual. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):127-31
Authors: Singh S, Fletcher KE, Pandl GJ, Schapira MM, Nattinger AB, Biblo LA, Whitt…

[Read more →]

Adherence to Guideline-Directed Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Among Medical and Surgical Inpatients at 33 Academic Medical Centers in the United States.
Am J Med Qual. 2011 Apr 13;
Authors: Schleyer AM, Schreuder AB, Jarm…

[Read more →]

Patient Satisfaction With Hospitalists: Facility-Level Analyses.

Am J Med Qual. 2011 Mar 1;

Authors: Fulton BR, Drevs KE, Ayala LJ, Malott DL

Despite concerns and disagreements about the impact of hospitalist models on health care, hospitalists are becoming the dominant means of providing inpatient care, and models continue to diversify. Understanding their impact and the factors that influence their adoption is essential. This study examined hospitalists’ impact on patient satisfaction, considering a host of characteristics. Cross-sectional data received in calendar year 2008, aggregated to the facility level, represent 1777 hospitals (41% of which employed hospitalists) and 2 648 275 patients. Press Ganey’s psychometrically sound inpatient satisfaction survey consists of 38 items (10 sections) rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Findings suggest that facilities with hospitalists may have an advantage regarding satisfaction with nursing and personal issues (eg, privacy, emotional needs, response to complaints), both of which may be related to broader communication issues. Moreover, teaching (overall satisfaction) and large facilities (satisfaction with admissions, nursing, and tests/treatments) might especially benefit from the presence of hospitalists. Exploring how specific hospitalist functions influence patient satisfaction may reap rewards.

PMID: 21364030 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

[Read more →]

Management of difficult airways using a hospital-wide “Alpha Team” approach.

Am J Med Qual. 2010 Jul-Aug;25(4):297-304

Authors: Long L, Vanderhoff B, Smyke N, Shaffer LE, Solomon J, Steuer JD

Airway management is germane to safe patient care. Keys to management of difficult airways (DAs) are the “Right People, Right Parts, and Right Place” (R3P3). Successful management of DA requires clinicians who have adequate training, experience, and equipment. Policies were implemented to optimize the management of DAs. One identified inpatients with potential DAs, whereas the other addressed creation and deployment of “Alpha Teams” (ATs). In the event of impending respiratory compromise, an AT was called in the same manner as a code blue. Health care providers were educated about these process changes, and ATs were tested using computerized patient simulators and self-paced observations. Testing assessed performance before, immediately after, and 30 days after the seminar. Changes in, and retention of, knowledge about DAs was analyzed. The goal of the R3P3 was to identify DAs and then to bring a well-trained hospital-wide AT to the bedside to decrease response time, rapidly establish a definitive airway, and improve survivability in an airway emergency.

PMID: 20606209 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

[Read more →]

Preprinted Standardized Orders Promote Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Compared With Traditional Handwritten Orders: An Endorsement of Standardized Evidence-Based Practice.

Am J Med Qual. 2010 Aug 30;

Authors: Gaylis FD, Van SJ, Daneshvar MA, Gaylis GM, Gaylis JB, Sheela RB, Stern EJ, Hanson PB, Sur RL

The objective was to determine if a standardized process of care-namely, standardized evidence-based medical orders (SEBMOs)-improves physician compliance with venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis. A total of 61 physicians received information about VTE prophylaxis after introduction of an admission SEBMO. Hospitalists received enhanced presentations about SEBMOs and their value in VTE prevention; specialists did not. Data were analyzed for 2 cohorts of 249 at-risk patients: one cohort was admitted with SEBMOs and the other with handwritten orders. VTE prophylaxis was ordered for 70% (173 of 249) of the SEBMO cohort compared with 22% (55 of 249) of patients whose physicians handwrote orders (relative risk ratio = 2.97; 95% confidence interval = 2.33-3.79; P < .0001). Specialists, who did not receive the enhanced education, were more likely to use handwritten orders and less likely to comply with prophylaxis standards. Standardized orders promote VTE prophylaxis more than handwritten orders. More rigorous education is required to promote compliance with evidence-based standards of medical practice.

PMID: 20805424 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

[Read more →]

Replacing an academic internal medicine residency program with a physician assistant–hospitalist model: a comparative analysis study.

Am J Med Qual. 2009 Mar-Apr;24(2):132-9

Authors: Dhuper S, Choksi S

This study describes a comparative analysis of replacing medical residents with physician assistants and hospitalists on patient outcomes in a community hospital. Prospective data during the physician assistants-hospitalists service for 2 years was compared with 2 years of retrospective data of the medical residents model. Outcome measures included mortality, adverse events, readmissions, and patient satisfaction. For physician assistants- hospitalists versus medical residents models, all-cause and case mix index-adjusted mortality was 107/5508 (1.94%) and 0.019 versus 156/5458 (2.85%) and 0.029, respectively (P < or = .001). The adverse event cases were 9 versus 5 ( P = .29), and the readmission rate within 30 days was 64 versus 69 (P = .34). Patient satisfaction was 95% versus 96% (P = .33). Quality of care provided by the physician assistants-hospitalists model was equivalent. All-cause and case mix index- adjusted mortality was significantly lower during the physician assistants-hospitalists period.Although the application of these findings to other institutions requires further study, the authors found no intrinsic barriers that would impede implementation elsewhere.

PMID: 19204122 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

[Read more →]

Spirometry utilization after hospitalization for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations.

Am J Med Qual. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):61-6

Authors: Volkova NB, Kodani A, Hilario D, Munyaradzi SM, Peterson MW

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the US population. An area of improvement hinges on early detection and proper monitoring. Spirometry is an important interventional tool; its underuse among hospitalized patients with COPD could affect quality of care. This study evaluates spirometry use at the Community Medical Center-Sierra in hospitalized patients with COPD. A retrospective medical record review from January 1, 2000, to March 15, 2002, assesses 1507 inpatients with COPD. The effects are analyzed of age, sex, race/ethnicity, diagnosis, insurance status, disposition, and admitting service on spirometry use by physicians are analyzed. A questionnaire is used to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of residents toward spirometry ordering. Baseline characteristics are similar between study groups. Only 3% of 1476 study patients have spirometry performed within the recommended time frame, and only 12.2% have at least 1 spirometry performed. Patients having a primary diagnosis of COPD have a greater likelihood of having spirometry performed (20.3% vs 11.1%, P < .001), as do patients who are discharged to home (13.4% vs 5.9%, P = .001). No significant effects are noted for sex, race/ethnicity, insurance status, or admitting service. The house staff surveys reveal that most do not know the indications for (72.0%) or how to order (46.0%) spirometry. Spirometry is underused among physicians who treat hospitalized patients with COPD. Future educational efforts aimed at improving physicians' ordering and use of spirometry are needed to address this disparity.

PMID: 19139465 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

[Read more →]

The tipping point: the relationship between volume and patient harm.

Am J Med Qual. 2008 Sep-Oct;23(5):336-41

Authors: Pedroja AT

This study purports to show the relationship between volume and patient harm due to health care error. Using 5 measures of volume and incident reports weighted for patient harm over the course of 515 days, it is shown that increased volume is related to increased harm to patients. As the number of areas in the hospital experiencing high volume increased, the likelihood of patients sustaining serious harm because of health care error also increased. This is attributed to reaching system capacity causing support services (ie, lab, pharmacy, radiology, housekeeping and engineering) to be overwhelmed and unable to keep up with requests from caregivers.

PMID: 18820138 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

[Read more →]