<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virtual Journal Club &#187; Am J Emerg Med</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/category/am-j-emerg-med/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub</link>
	<description>Division of Hospital Medicine Virtual Journal Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Killip classification in patients with acute coronary syndrome: insight from a multicenter registry.</title>
		<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2012/01/24/killip-classification-in-patients-with-acute-coronary-syndrome-insight-from-a-multicenter-registry/</link>
		<comments>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2012/01/24/killip-classification-in-patients-with-acute-coronary-syndrome-insight-from-a-multicenter-registry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Am J Emerg Med]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/?guid=e2c08d24575fdac4421cd9e9ea6e1e9c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Killip classification in patients with acute coronary syndrome: insight from a multicente...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<body><table><tr><td/></tr></table><p><b>Killip classification in patients with acute coronary syndrome: insight from a multicenter registry.</b></p>
        <p>Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;30(1):97-103</p>
        <p>Authors:  El-Menyar A, Zubaid M, AlMahmeed W, Sulaiman K, AlNabti A, Singh R, Al Suwaidi J</p>
        <p>Abstract<br/>
        The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic value of the Killip classification at the presentation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In 2007 and over 5 months, 6704 consecutive patients with ACS were enrolled in the Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Patients were categorized according to Killip classification at presentation (Classes I, II, III, and IV). Patients' characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were analyzed. High Killip classes were defined in 22% of patients. In comparison to Killip Class I, patients with higher Killip class had greater prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, presented late, were less likely to have angina, and were less likely to receive antiplatelet, statins, and ?-blockers. Classes II, III, and IV were associated with higher adjusted odds of death in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (odds ratio [OR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-3.69; OR 6.1, 95% CI 3.41-10.86; and OR 28, 95% CI 15.24-54.70, respectively) and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (adjusted OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.24-4.82; OR 3.2,95% 1.49-7.02; and OR 9.8, 95% CI 3.79-25.57, respectively). In conclusion, across ACS, patients with higher Killip class had worse clinical profile and were less likely to be treated with evidence-based therapy. High Killip class was independent predictors of mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Physician in the emergency department should be aware of the importance of clinical examination in the risk stratification in patients presenting with ACS.<br/></p><p>PMID: 21159479 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p></body>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2012/01/24/killip-classification-in-patients-with-acute-coronary-syndrome-insight-from-a-multicenter-registry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diagnostic performance of a pocket-sized ultrasound device for quick-look cardiac imaging.</title>
		<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2012/01/24/diagnostic-performance-of-a-pocket-sized-ultrasound-device-for-quick-look-cardiac-imaging/</link>
		<comments>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2012/01/24/diagnostic-performance-of-a-pocket-sized-ultrasound-device-for-quick-look-cardiac-imaging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Am J Emerg Med]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/?guid=4915c47e283986f79b7868360714abfa</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Diagnostic performance of a pocket-sized ultrasound device for quick-look cardiac imaging...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<body><table><tr><td/></tr></table><p><b>Diagnostic performance of a pocket-sized ultrasound device for quick-look cardiac imaging.</b></p>
        <p>Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;30(1):32-6</p>
        <p>Authors:  Kimura BJ, Gilcrease GW, Showalter BK, Phan JN, Wolfson T</p>
        <p>Abstract<br/>
        BACKGROUND: Although pocket-sized, simplified ultrasound devices have emerged to enable subjective point-of-care assessment, few data on their cardiac application exist. We sought to examine the image quality and the accuracy of subjective diagnosis of video loops obtained from a pocket-sized ultrasound device for 2 significant cardiac abnormalities, left ventricular systolic dysfunction and left atrial enlargement, obtained from a single, quick-look view.<br/>
        METHODS: Parasternal left ventricular long-axis images acquired with a miniaturized commercially available device (Acuson P10) were reviewed using subjective criteria for left ventricular systolic dysfunction and left atrial enlargement and were compared with M-mode measurements of left atrial systolic diameter and E-point septal separation from a fully featured echocardiograph in 78 inpatients referred for standard echocardiography. Interpretive confidence and image quality were evaluated with each interpretation.<br/>
        RESULTS: Of 78 inpatient studies, 19% of pocket ultrasound and 13% of standard studies were technically limited (P = NS). Of 61 technically adequate studies, subjective interpretation of pocket ultrasound images had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 79%, 52%, and 64% for left atrial diameter more than 4 cm; 47%, 98%, and 82% for E-point septal separation more than 1 cm of; 83%, 62%, and 74% for either abnormality; and 92%, 82%, and 87% for either abnormality when interpretive confidence was present (n = 23). The pocket ultrasound image quality scores were significantly lower than the standard echocardiograph (P &lt; .001).<br/>
        CONCLUSION: The pocket-sized device provided adequate imaging for screening of 2 significant cardiac entities. Subjective interpretation of a single parasternal view may help identify patients with cardiac disease.<br/></p><p>PMID: 21035983 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p></body>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2012/01/24/diagnostic-performance-of-a-pocket-sized-ultrasound-device-for-quick-look-cardiac-imaging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small-bore catheter versus chest tube drainage for pneumothorax.</title>
		<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2012/01/06/small-bore-catheter-versus-chest-tube-drainage-for-pneumothorax/</link>
		<comments>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2012/01/06/small-bore-catheter-versus-chest-tube-drainage-for-pneumothorax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Am J Emerg Med]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/?guid=7f2b83e3cb2beac2c22a621c4d9677a5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Small-bore catheter versus chest tube drainage for pneumothorax.
        Am J Emerg Med. ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<body><table><tr><td/></tr></table><p><b>Small-bore catheter versus chest tube drainage for pneumothorax.</b></p>
        <p>Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jan 2;</p>
        <p>Authors:  Contou D, Razazi K, Katsahian S, Maitre B, Mekontso-Dessap A, Brun-Buisson C, Thille AW</p>
        <p>Abstract<br/>
        STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of drainage via a single-lumen (5F catheter) central venous catheter (CVC) to a conventional (14-20F catheter) chest tube (CT) for the management of pneumothoraces, including primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP), secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP), and traumatic and iatrogenic pneumothoraces. PATIENTS: All consecutive patients admitted to the intermediate intensive care unit of a university hospital for pneumothorax were retrospectively screened over an 8-year period. Patients were preferentially treated using CT from 2003 to 2007 and using CVC from 2008 to 2010. Drainage failure was defined as the need for a second drainage procedure or for surgery. RESULTS: Of 212 patients included, 117 (55%) had PSP, 28 (13%) had SSP associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 19 (9%) had traumatic pneumothorax, and 48 (23%) had iatrogenic pneumothorax. The failure rate was 23% in PSP, 36% in SSP, 16% in traumatic pneumothorax, and only 2% in iatrogenic pneumothorax. After adjustment, iatrogenic pneumothorax was the only factor that had an influence on drainage failure. The failure rate was similar between the 112 patients treated using CVC and the 100 patients treated using CT (18% vs 21%, P = .60). However, the durations of drainage (3.3 ± 1.9 vs 4.6 ± 2.6 days, P &lt; .01) and of hospital stay were significantly shorter in patients treated using CVC as compared with CT. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that drainage via a catheter or via a CT is similarly effective in the management of pneumothorax. We recommend considering drainage via a small-bore catheter as a first-line treatment in patients with pneumothorax, whatever its cause.<br/></p><p>PMID: 22217820 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p></body>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2012/01/06/small-bore-catheter-versus-chest-tube-drainage-for-pneumothorax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hospital-level variation in the percentage of admissions originating in the emergency department.</title>
		<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/12/30/hospital-level-variation-in-the-percentage-of-admissions-originating-in-the-emergency-department/</link>
		<comments>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/12/30/hospital-level-variation-in-the-percentage-of-admissions-originating-in-the-emergency-department/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 23:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Am J Emerg Med]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/?guid=a5c97d053704752b8fcb6a5202d4728b</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hospital-level variation in the percentage of admissions originating in the emergency dep...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<body><table><tr><td/></tr></table><p><b>Hospital-level variation in the percentage of admissions originating in the emergency department.</b></p>
        <p>Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Dec 26;</p>
        <p>Authors:  Studnicki J, Platonova EA, Fisher JW</p>
        <p>Abstract<br/>
        PURPOSE: Well over half of all US hospital patients are now admitted directly through the emergency department (ED) rather than scheduled through the admissions department by a referring member of the medical staff. This study sought to understand hospital-level variation in the percentage of admissions originating in the ED. BASIC PROCEDURES: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of 5 748 375 ED visits and 2 265 478 inpatient discharge occurring in 192 short-term acute Florida hospitals in calendar year 2005. MAIN FINDINGS: Hospitals with increasing percentages of patients admitted through the ED are smaller in scale with fewer admissions, beds, and smaller medical staffs but admit a higher percentage of their ED visits to the hospital. Patients in these hospitals are increasingly Hispanic, older, Medicare insured, and likely to represent a preventable ambulatory sensitive condition. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing rate of admissions from the ED department is a national trend, but there is substantial variation at the hospital level. In Florida, measures of hospital scale and an older population with some limitations in access to, or the quality of, primary care are the factors influencing hospital-level variation. Factors implicated in increased ED use such as ED visit acuity, lack of insurance, and race are not important contributory variables. The process of admission and, particularly, the role of the organized medical staff in this process are evolving, and the consequences of these changes require further research.<br/></p><p>PMID: 22205007 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p></body>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/12/30/hospital-level-variation-in-the-percentage-of-admissions-originating-in-the-emergency-department/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impact of inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy on outcome of bacteremic adults visiting the ED.</title>
		<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/12/30/impact-of-inappropriate-empirical-antibiotic-therapy-on-outcome-of-bacteremic-adults-visiting-the-ed/</link>
		<comments>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/12/30/impact-of-inappropriate-empirical-antibiotic-therapy-on-outcome-of-bacteremic-adults-visiting-the-ed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 23:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Am J Emerg Med]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/?guid=ad438ca1b2f9678a346f5208ad9a15f7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Impact of inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy on outcome of bacteremic adults visi...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<body><table><tr><td/></tr></table><p><b>Impact of inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy on outcome of bacteremic adults visiting the ED.</b></p>
        <p>Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Dec 26;</p>
        <p>Authors:  Lee CC, Lee CH, Chuang MC, Hong MY, Hsu HC, Ko WC</p>
        <p>Abstract<br/>
        OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical impact of inappropriate empirical antibiotics on patient outcome and determine the risk factors for mortality in bacteremic adults who visited the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Bacteremic adults visiting the ED from January 2007 to June 2008 were identified retrospectively. Demographic characteristics, clinical conditions, bacteremic pathogens, antimicrobial agents, and outcomes were determined from chart records. RESULTS: The total of 454 eligible bacteremic adults were included in the analysis; excluded from the study were another 261 patients with contaminated blood cultures and 64 patients with ED stays of less than 24 hours. Among the included individuals, the mean age was 64.6 years, with a small predominance of males (230 patients, 50.7%). Of a total 494 bacteremic isolates, Escherichia coli (206, 41.7%) and Klebsiella species (81, 16.4%) were the most frequently encountered microorganisms. A lower 28-day mortality rate was demonstrated in bacteremic patients treated with appropriate antibiotics than that in those with inappropriate antibiotics or that in those with no antibiotic therapy, as judged by Kaplan-Meier survival curves (P = .01). Moreover, the differences among these three groups achieved higher significance (P = .002) in critically ill patients (Pittsburgh bacteremia scores of ?4 points). In multivariate analyses, inappropriate antibiotic therapy in the ED was associated independently with mortality at 28 days (odds ratio, 2.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-5.13; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: For bacteremic adults visiting the ED, their outcomes were favorable following appropriate antibiotics, compared to treatment with inappropriate antibiotics or no antibiotics.<br/></p><p>PMID: 22205015 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p></body>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/12/30/impact-of-inappropriate-empirical-antibiotic-therapy-on-outcome-of-bacteremic-adults-visiting-the-ed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria rule in a community hospital ED: a retrospective study of its potential utility.</title>
		<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/12/30/the-pulmonary-embolism-rule-out-criteria-rule-in-a-community-hospital-ed-a-retrospective-study-of-its-potential-utility/</link>
		<comments>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/12/30/the-pulmonary-embolism-rule-out-criteria-rule-in-a-community-hospital-ed-a-retrospective-study-of-its-potential-utility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Am J Emerg Med]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/?guid=03cf8cedc942cb339ebc8c995eaaee66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria rule in a community hospital ED: a retrospective...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<body><table><tr><td/></tr></table><p><b>The Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria rule in a community hospital ED: a retrospective study of its potential utility.</b></p>
        <p>Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;29(9):1023-7</p>
        <p>Authors:  Dachs RJ, Kulkarni D, Higgins GL</p>
        <p>Abstract<br/>
        BACKGROUND: The Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria (PERC) rule identifies patients who can be safely discharged from the emergency department (ED) without undergoing laboratory or radiological investigation for possible pulmonary embolism (PE). It was shown to be 99% sensitive in a large validation series. Our objective was to assess the PERC rule's performance in a representative US community hospital.<br/>
        METHODS: A chart review of ED patients receiving computed tomographic scans (CTS) for possible PE during a 4-month study period was performed. The PERC rule was applied to this cohort, and its sensitivity and negative predictive value were determined.<br/>
        RESULTS: Two hundred thirteen patients underwent chest CTS to "rule out" PE. Forty-eight patients met PERC rule criteria, and all had negative CTS. Of the remaining 165 patients, 18 patients (11%) had scans positive for PE. The overall prevalence of PE was 8.45% (95% CI, 5.22-13.24%). The PERC rule's sensitivity was 100% (95% CI, 78.12-100%), with a negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 90.80-100%). Application of the PERC rule at the point-of-care would have reduced CTS by 23%.<br/>
        CONCLUSIONS: In our community hospital, the PERC rule successfully identified ED patients who did not require CTS evaluation for PE. Had the PERC rule been applied, nearly one-quarter of all CTS performed to "rule out PE" could have been avoided.<br/></p><p>PMID: 20708891 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p></body>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/12/30/the-pulmonary-embolism-rule-out-criteria-rule-in-a-community-hospital-ed-a-retrospective-study-of-its-potential-utility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prevalence of validated risk factors for developing atrial fibrillation-can we identify high-risk ED patients?</title>
		<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/11/22/prevalence-of-validated-risk-factors-for-developing-atrial-fibrillation-can-we-identify-high-risk-ed-patients/</link>
		<comments>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/11/22/prevalence-of-validated-risk-factors-for-developing-atrial-fibrillation-can-we-identify-high-risk-ed-patients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Am J Emerg Med]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/?guid=e9075994c97335fc9f1bafc1b86a992f</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prevalence of validated risk factors for developing atrial fibrillation-can we identify h...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<body><table><tr><td/></tr></table><p><b>Prevalence of validated risk factors for developing atrial fibrillation-can we identify high-risk ED patients?</b></p>
        <p>Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Nov 17;</p>
        <p>Authors:  Barrett TW, Couch SA, Jenkins CA, Storrow AB</p>
        <p>Abstract<br/>
        OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether emergency department (ED) patients who were newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF) displayed risk factors for incident AF on prior ED visits. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study of ED patients with symptomatic AF at a tertiary referral center. We selected patients who were newly diagnosed with AF between July 1, 2005, and August 31, 2008, and had at least 1 ED visit before their diagnosis. We calculated the Framingham Heart Study AF risk score for each visit by documenting the presence of the risk factors (age, sex, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, hypertension treatment, PR interval, and ages of clinically significant cardiac murmur and heart failure diagnosis). RESULTS: Of the 296 patients newly diagnosed with AF, 115 (39%) had at least 1 prior ED visit resulting in 454 ED visits for analysis. The median time from first to last visit was 4 years (interquartile range [IQR], 2.1-5.9). The median age was 66 years (IQR, 49-79 years). Home medications included antihypertensives in 81% of visits, and 60% of visits with available electrocardiograms had a PR interval of 160 milliseconds or more. Heart failure history was reported in 23% of visits. The median AF risk score was 8 (IQR, 4-10) corresponding to a 16% 10-year predicted risk. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 40% of patients diagnosed with new AF had previous ED visits and displayed validated risk factors for incident AF. The ED provides an opportunity to identify and educate these patients as well as refer them for primary prevention interventions.<br/></p><p>PMID: 22100470 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p></body>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/11/22/prevalence-of-validated-risk-factors-for-developing-atrial-fibrillation-can-we-identify-high-risk-ed-patients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ultrasound detection of obstructive pyelonephritis due to urolithiasis in the ED.</title>
		<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/11/09/ultrasound-detection-of-obstructive-pyelonephritis-due-to-urolithiasis-in-the-ed/</link>
		<comments>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/11/09/ultrasound-detection-of-obstructive-pyelonephritis-due-to-urolithiasis-in-the-ed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Am J Emerg Med]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/?guid=193c717bad0a2cfc1e3f6c7b71fe402a</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ultrasound detection of obstructive pyelonephritis due to urolithiasis in the ED.
       ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<body><table><tr><td/></tr></table><p><b>Ultrasound detection of obstructive pyelonephritis due to urolithiasis in the ED.</b></p>
        <p>Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;29(7):843.e1-3</p>
        <p>Authors:  Carnell J, Fischer J, Nagdev A</p>
        <p>Abstract<br/>
        Identifying acute pyelonephritis (APN) with early obstructive uropathy is clinically important in the emergency department (ED) because obstructive urolithiasis is an independent risk factor for inpatient death, prolonged hospitalization, and failure of outpatient APN therapy. Furthermore, diagnosis of an early obstructive uropathy can be difficult when based solely on clinical findings. Clinicians may assume the cause of the patient's symptoms to be APN alone, without considering the concurrent presence of an obstructing stone. A feasible screening test to detect early obstructive uropathy in cases of APN has not been previously identified. Plain film radiographs are insensitive in locating a suspected calcified stone. Computed tomography is readily available in most EDs and clearly defines urologic anatomy, but delivers unnecessary ionizing radiation, can prolong ED length of stay, and is not cost-effective as a screening test for all patients diagnosed with APN. We report a case in which a bedside ultrasound identifying hydronephrosis prompted confirmatory computed tomography imaging and emergency consultation of a patient with APN. In this case, hydronephrosis on bedside ultrasound examination was an indirect marker of a distal ureteral obstruction. By detecting the presence of hydronephrosis in patients with APN, emergency physicians may dramatically increase their ability to identify those patients that need further radiographic investigation and ultimately decrease the rate of outpatient treatment failure. Further surveillance data are needed to determine the statistical characteristics of this novel screening test and if routine renal evaluation of all patients with APN is warranted.<br/></p><p>PMID: 20934827 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p></body>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/11/09/ultrasound-detection-of-obstructive-pyelonephritis-due-to-urolithiasis-in-the-ed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Complications of percutaneous procedures.</title>
		<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/11/09/complications-of-percutaneous-procedures/</link>
		<comments>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/11/09/complications-of-percutaneous-procedures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Am J Emerg Med]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/?guid=3433c1431d003ebe7fb5fd6ca354c899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Complications of percutaneous procedures.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;29(7):802-10
 ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<body><table><tr><td/></tr></table><p><b>Complications of percutaneous procedures.</b></p>
        <p>Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;29(7):802-10</p>
        <p>Authors:  Chen EH, Nemeth A</p>
        <p>Abstract<br/>
        Minimally invasive percutaneous procedures are increasingly being performed by both interventional radiologists and noninterventionalists. Patients with postprocedural issues will likely present to the emergency department for evaluation and treatment. This review focuses on the evaluation and management of the complications of common percutaneous procedures.<br/></p><p>PMID: 20674222 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p></body>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/11/09/complications-of-percutaneous-procedures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Additional predictive value of serum potassium to Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction risk score for early malignant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with acute myocardial infarction.</title>
		<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/11/01/additional-predictive-value-of-serum-potassium-to-thrombolysis-in-myocardial-infarction-risk-score-for-early-malignant-ventricular-arrhythmias-in-patients-with-acute-myocardial-infarction/</link>
		<comments>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/11/01/additional-predictive-value-of-serum-potassium-to-thrombolysis-in-myocardial-infarction-risk-score-for-early-malignant-ventricular-arrhythmias-in-patients-with-acute-myocardial-infarction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Am J Emerg Med]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/?guid=cdb40384289f4087f2e5276a2e415e6e</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Additional predictive value of serum potassium to Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction r...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<body><table><tr><td/></tr></table><p><b>Additional predictive value of serum potassium to Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction risk score for early malignant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with acute myocardial infarction.</b></p>
        <p>Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct 27;</p>
        <p>Authors:  Su J, Fu X, Tian Y, Ma Y, Chen H, Wang Y, Wang X, Liu H</p>
        <p>Abstract<br/>
        OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the additional predictive value of serum potassium (SK) to Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score for malignant ventricular arrhythmias (MVA) in patients within 24 hours of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: This was a 6-year retrospective study. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of SK and TIMI risk score for MVA attack. In addition, SK-modified TIMI risk score was created by incorporating SK information into the usual score; the accuracy of new score was compared with that of the usual TIMI risk score by comparing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). RESULTS: Among the 468 patients enrolled, the incidence of MVA 24 hours after AMI was 9.4%, and it was higher in the hypokalemia group compared with that of the normokalemic group (27.3% vs 7.5%, P &lt; .001; odds ratio, 4.594; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.159-9.774). A significant predictive value of SK was indicated by AUC of 0.787 (95% CI, 0.747-0.823, P &lt; .01). Serum potassium remained a predictor of MVA after being adjusted by the variables in TIMI risk score. The AUC of TIMI risk score in relation to MVA was 0.586 (95% CI, 0.54-0.631; P = .0676). The incorporation of SK into TIMI risk score improved its predictive value for MVA attack (AUC = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.568-0.753; P &lt; .001), with significant difference between AUC of the new score and that of the original risk score (Z = 2.474, P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: Serum potassium on admission to the emergency department may be used as a valuable predictor and could add predictive information to some extent to TIMI risk score for MVA attack during 24-hour post-AMI.<br/></p><p>PMID: 22035586 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p></body>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/11/01/additional-predictive-value-of-serum-potassium-to-thrombolysis-in-myocardial-infarction-risk-score-for-early-malignant-ventricular-arrhythmias-in-patients-with-acute-myocardial-infarction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bedside ultrasound performed by novices for the detection of abscess in ED patients with soft tissue infections.</title>
		<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/10/28/bedside-ultrasound-performed-by-novices-for-the-detection-of-abscess-in-ed-patients-with-soft-tissue-infections/</link>
		<comments>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/10/28/bedside-ultrasound-performed-by-novices-for-the-detection-of-abscess-in-ed-patients-with-soft-tissue-infections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Am J Emerg Med]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/?guid=ef9408476ddbbd38f1fd2767b901fa4a</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Bedside ultrasound performed by novices for the detection of abscess in ED patients with soft tissue infections.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct 24;
        Authors:  Berger T, Garrido F, Green J, Lema PC, Gupta J
        Abstract
        OBJ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" width="100%"><tr><td align="left"></td></tr></table>
        <p><b>Bedside ultrasound performed by novices for the detection of abscess in ED patients with soft tissue infections.</b></p>
        <p>Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct 24;</p>
        <p>Authors:  Berger T, Garrido F, Green J, Lema PC, Gupta J</p>
        <p>Abstract<br>
        OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare bedside ultrasound (US) to clinical examination for the detection of abscess. METHODS: This is a 24-month prospective, observational emergency department (ED) study. Adults with suspected nondraining abscess with planned incision and drainage (I&amp;D) are included in the study. Exclusion criteria are spontaneous drainage and perineal, perirectal, or intraoral location. Before I&amp;D, a second ED physician conducts an US and records the presence or absence of findings suggestive of abscess. A positive I&amp;D of the suspected abscess is the criterion standard. The treating practitioner is blinded to the US results. Ultrasound is performed by novice ED physicians. The findings of the US, the prediction of pus from the clinician and the ultrasonographer in 3 strata (low, indeterminate, definite), and the results of the I&amp;D (pus/no pus) are recorded onto data sheets. Measures of association are reported and Fisher&#39;s Exact test is used. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled. The sensitivity of novice sonographers to predict a positive I&amp;D with US was 0.97 (0.83-1.00), the specificity was 0.67 (0.24-0.94), the positive likelihood ratio was 2.90, the negative likelihood ratio was 0.04, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85 (0.66-1.00). Clinical examination yielded a sensitivity of 0.76 (0.58-0.89), specificity of 0.83 (0.36-0.99), positive likelihood ratio of 4.50, negative likelihood ratio of 0.29, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75 (0.50-1.00). CONCLUSION: Novice ED sonographers can identify abscesses with only minimal US training. Identification of abscess on US may change management of cutaneous abscesses.<br>
        </p><p>PMID: 22030180 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/10/28/bedside-ultrasound-performed-by-novices-for-the-detection-of-abscess-in-ed-patients-with-soft-tissue-infections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Treating primary headaches in the ED: can droperidol regain its role?</title>
		<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/10/28/treating-primary-headaches-in-the-ed-can-droperidol-regain-its-role/</link>
		<comments>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/10/28/treating-primary-headaches-in-the-ed-can-droperidol-regain-its-role/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Am J Emerg Med]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/?guid=35627cc4f4f1dbea688029523691112c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Treating primary headaches in the ED: can droperidol regain its role?
        Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct 24;
        Authors:  Faine B, Hogrefe C, Heukelom JV, Smelser J
        Abstract
        OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe t...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" width="100%"><tr><td align="left"></td></tr></table>
        <p><b>Treating primary headaches in the ED: can droperidol regain its role?</b></p>
        <p>Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct 24;</p>
        <p>Authors:  Faine B, Hogrefe C, Heukelom JV, Smelser J</p>
        <p>Abstract<br>
        OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the use and efficacy of low-dose (?2 mg) droperidol for the treatment of primary headaches (ie, migraine, cluster, tension-type headache and trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, and other primary headaches) in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: A report was generated from a pharmacy database to identify all adult patients who received low-dose droperidol in the ED over a 7-month period; a subsequent retrospective chart review was conducted. Low-dose droperidol was defined as a cumulative dose of ?2 mg. Patients who received droperidol for any other reason than the treatment of a headache were excluded. Data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Seventy-three cases in which droperidol was administered for the treatment of a headache were identified over the 7-month period. Most doses (92%) administered were 1.25 mg or less. Fifty-three patients (73%) had complete resolution or significant improvement of headache symptoms as subjectively or objectively (eg, numerical pain scale) documented by the treating physician. Eight patients (11%) had minimal improvement in their headaches symptoms; 12 patients (16%) received no relief after the administration of droperidol. The average time to discharge from the ED was 94.8 ± 67.2 minutes. No cardiac arrhythmias were noted. Other adverse events included 2 cases of extrapyramidal side effects; one patient reported restlessness/anxiousness and the other patient had dystonia. CONCLUSION: The administration of low-dose (?2 mg) droperidol may be safe and effective for the treatment of primary headaches in the ED.<br>
        </p><p>PMID: 22030187 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/10/28/treating-primary-headaches-in-the-ed-can-droperidol-regain-its-role/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The value of procalcitonin level in community-acquired pneumonia in the ED.</title>
		<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/10/28/the-value-of-procalcitonin-level-in-community-acquired-pneumonia-in-the-ed/</link>
		<comments>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/10/28/the-value-of-procalcitonin-level-in-community-acquired-pneumonia-in-the-ed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Am J Emerg Med]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/?guid=b9ea2c9171770e72741bddbf03a0635b</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        The value of procalcitonin level in community-acquired pneumonia in the ED.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct 24;
        Authors:  Park JH, Wee JH, Choi SP, Oh SH
        Abstract
        OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate th...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" width="100%"><tr><td align="left"></td></tr></table>
        <p><b>The value of procalcitonin level in community-acquired pneumonia in the ED.</b></p>
        <p>Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct 24;</p>
        <p>Authors:  Park JH, Wee JH, Choi SP, Oh SH</p>
        <p>Abstract<br>
        OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the value of procalcitonin (PCT) level in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of patients with CAP in the ED. Patients presenting with a clinical and radiographic diagnosis of CAP were enrolled. The authors measured inflammatory biomarkers. The severity of CAP was assessed by 3 prediction rules. We performed an analysis to assess the value of each biomarker for the prediction of mortality and CAP severity. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients with CAP are included. Sixteen patients who were older and belonged to high-risk group died within 28 days. Nonsurvivors had significantly increased median PCT level (1.96 vs 0.18 ng/mL) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (158.57 vs 91.28 mg/dL) compared with survivors. The median PCT levels were significantly higher in more severe disease, on 3 prediction rules. In regression logistic analyses, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of PCT level were 0.828 (95% confidence interval, 0.750-0.889). The addition of PCT level to three prediction rules significantly increased the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. These results suggest that PCT measurement is more versatile tool for predicting mortality and the severity of disease among patients with CAP in the ED. CONCLUSIONS: Procalcitonin level is valuable for predicting mortality and the severity of disease among patients with CAP at ED admission. Procalcitonin level as an adjunct to CAP prediction rules may be valuable for prognosis and severity assessment.<br>
        </p><p>PMID: 22030193 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/10/28/the-value-of-procalcitonin-level-in-community-acquired-pneumonia-in-the-ed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Less painful arterial blood gas sampling using jet injection of 2% lidocaine: a randomized controlled clinical trial.</title>
		<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/10/28/less-painful-arterial-blood-gas-sampling-using-jet-injection-of-2-lidocaine-a-randomized-controlled-clinical-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/10/28/less-painful-arterial-blood-gas-sampling-using-jet-injection-of-2-lidocaine-a-randomized-controlled-clinical-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Am J Emerg Med]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/?guid=32ee97bdd2e9e6a301da167d7593f25f</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Less painful arterial blood gas sampling using jet injection of 2% lidocaine: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct 24;
        Authors:  Hajiseyedjavady H, Saeedi M, Eslami V, Shahsavarinia K, Farahmand S
  ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" width="100%"><tr><td align="left"></td></tr></table>
        <p><b>Less painful arterial blood gas sampling using jet injection of 2% lidocaine: a randomized controlled clinical trial.</b></p>
        <p>Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct 24;</p>
        <p>Authors:  Hajiseyedjavady H, Saeedi M, Eslami V, Shahsavarinia K, Farahmand S</p>
        <p>Abstract<br>
        OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare pain levels from arterial blood gas (ABG) sampling performed with or without application of lidocaine via jet injector. BACKGROUND: Pain is still a primary concern in the emergency department. Arterial blood gas sampling is a very painful procedure. No better technique for decreasing the pain of the ABG procedure has been presented. An ideal local anesthesia procedure for ABG sampling should be rapid, easily learned, inexpensive, and free of needlestick risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the effectiveness of a lidocaine jet injection technique in achieving satisfactory pain control in patients undergoing ABG sampling. Forty-two patients were randomized to 2 groups: group A, which received lidocaine by jet injection (0.2 mL of lidocaine 2%), and group B, a control group that received a topical application of 1 mL of lidocaine gel 2% 2 minutes before the ABG sampling. Pain was assessed on a 10-cm visual analog scale (0, absence of pain; 10, greatest imaginable pain). RESULTS: The pain visual analog scale score during ABG sampling was considerably lower in group A compared with group B (1.29 ± 0.90 vs 4.19 ± 1.43; P &lt; .001). The number of attempts required for ABG sampling was significantly lower in group A compared with group B (1.29 ± 0.46 vs 2.1 ± 0.12; P = .009). All residents reported ease of use with the lidocaine jet injection procedure (P &lt; .05). CONCLUSION: Lidocaine jet injection provides beneficial and rapid anesthesia, resulting in less pain and a greater rate of successful ABG sampling. Therefore, it is recommended for use before ABG sampling to decrease the patient&#39;s pain and the number of unsuccessful attempts and to enhance the patient&#39;s satisfaction.<br>
        </p><p>PMID: 22030199 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/10/28/less-painful-arterial-blood-gas-sampling-using-jet-injection-of-2-lidocaine-a-randomized-controlled-clinical-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evaluation of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III in predicting the prognosis of patients admitted to Emergency Department, in need of intensive care unit.</title>
		<link>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/10/28/evaluation-of-the-acute-physiology-and-chronic-health-evaluation-iii-in-predicting-the-prognosis-of-patients-admitted-to-emergency-department-in-need-of-intensive-care-unit/</link>
		<comments>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/10/28/evaluation-of-the-acute-physiology-and-chronic-health-evaluation-iii-in-predicting-the-prognosis-of-patients-admitted-to-emergency-department-in-need-of-intensive-care-unit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Am J Emerg Med]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/?guid=6bf4413af8b1c6df9497b4cd943df562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Evaluation of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III in predicting the prognosis of patients admitted to Emergency Department, in need of intensive care unit.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct 24;
        Authors:  Hatamabadi HR...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" width="100%"><tr><td align="left"></td></tr></table>
        <p><b>Evaluation of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III in predicting the prognosis of patients admitted to Emergency Department, in need of intensive care unit.</b></p>
        <p>Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct 24;</p>
        <p>Authors:  Hatamabadi HR, Darbandsar Mazandarani P, Abdalvand A, Arhami Dolatabadi A, Amini A, Kariman H, Derakhshanfar H</p>
        <p>Abstract<br>
        INTRODUCTION: Many of critically ill patients receive medical care for prolonged periods in emergency department (ED). This study is the evaluation of efficiency of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III scoring system in predicting mortality rate in these patients. METHODS: This study was conducted between 2008 and 2009 in Tehran, Iran. One hundred subjects were enrolled in the study. Cases were chosen from patients in need of intensive care unit (ICU) bed who were kept in the ED. The APACHE III scores and predicted and observed mortality rates were calculated using the information from patients&#39; files, interviews with the patients&#39; families, and performing required physical examinations and laboratory tests. RESULTS: The age of the patients and the ED length of stay were 66.07 (±19.92) years and 5.11 (±3.79) days, respectively. The mean (±SD) of APACHE III score of the patients was 58.89 (±18.24). The predicted mortality rate was calculated to be 32.73%, whereas the observed mortality rate was 55%. The mean (±SD) of APACHE III score of survivors and nonsurvivors was 48.63 (±16.35) and 67.63 (±14.84), respectively (P &lt; .001). Furthermore, the ED length of stay was 3.20 (±1.34) and 6.57 (±4.4) days in survivors vs nonsurvivors, respectively (P &lt; .001). CONCLUSION: The APACHE III score and ED lengths of stay were higher in this study compared with other studies. This could be ascribed to more critical patients presenting to the study center and also limited ICU bed availability. This study was indicative of applicability of APACHE III scoring system in evaluating the quality of care and prognosis of ED patients in need of ICU.<br>
        </p><p>PMID: 22030201 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beckerinfo.net/JClub/2011/10/28/evaluation-of-the-acute-physiology-and-chronic-health-evaluation-iii-in-predicting-the-prognosis-of-patients-admitted-to-emergency-department-in-need-of-intensive-care-unit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

