Meta-Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcomes With Dronedarone in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation or Heart Failure.

Am J Cardiol. 2012 May 18;

Authors: Chatterjee S, Ghosh J, Lichstein E, Aikat S, Mukherjee D

Abstract
Dronedarone is a benzofuran derivative approved by the Food and Drug Administration to decrease the risk of cardiovascular hospitalization in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and associated cardiovascular risk factors who are in sinus rhythm or will undergo cardioversion. There has been recent evidence to suggest that dronedarone may not have a favorable safety profile. We decided to evaluate all available evidence on the cardiovascular safety of this drug. A systematic search was made of the PubMed, CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases for randomized controlled trials from 1966 through 2011 comparing dronedarone to comparators in AF/heart failure. Intervention was dronedarone for AF for some studies and heart failure for others. Comparators included standard medical therapy and/or placebo and amiodarone for 1 study. Outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, ventricular arrhythmias, embolic events, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure exacerbations, and hospitalization rates in the intervention versus comparator group at the end of ?3 months of follow up with abstraction of data by 1 author. Seven randomized controlled trials were included in our analysis. Dronedarone use was associated with a trend toward worse all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities and increased heart failure exacerbations. It also showed numerically higher event rates for all other outcome events except acute coronary syndrome. Our pooled analysis showed increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities and increased heart failure exacerbations with use of dronedarone across a wide spectrum of populations. In conclusion, we recommend exercising caution using dronedarone, especially in patients with cardiovascular risk factors.

PMID: 22608952 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Relation of Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio to Coronary Flow to In-Hospital Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients With ST-Elevated Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Coronary Intervention.

Am J Cardiol. 2012 May 17;

Authors: Akpek M, Kaya MG, Lam YY, Sahin O, Elcik D, Celik T, Ergin A, Gibson CM

Abstract
With the growing understanding of the role of inflammation in patients with atherosclerotic disease, studies have focused on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and other inflammatory markers in their association with outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The goal of this study was to investigate the association of the neutrophil/lymphocyte (N/L) ratio and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The association of hs-CRP and N/L ratio on admission with Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade after PCI was assessed in 418 consecutive primary patients with PCI. The N/L ratio was significantly higher in the no-reflow group (TIMI grade 0/1/2 flow, n = 158) compared to that of the normal-flow group (TIMI grade 3 flow, n = 260, 4.6 ± 1.7 vs 3.1 ± 1.9, p <0.001). In-hospital MACEs were significantly higher in patients with no reflow (23% vs 7%, p <0.001). There was a significant and positive correlation between hs-CRP and N/L ratio (r = 0.657, p <0.001). In receiver operating characteristic analysis, N/L ratio >3.3 predicted no reflow with 74% sensitivity and 83% specificity. In a multivariate regression model, N/L ratio remained an independent correlate of no reflow (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34 to 1.76, p <0.001) and in-hospital MACEs (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.32, p = 0.043). The N/L ratio, an inexpensive and easily measurable laboratory variable, is independently associated with the development of no reflow and in-hospital MACEs in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI.

PMID: 22608360 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Comparison of bleeding and in-hospital mortality in Asian-Americans versus Caucasian-Americans with ST-elevation myocardial infarction receiving reperfusion therapy.

Am J Cardiol. 2012 Apr 1;109(7):925-31

Authors: Mehta RH, Parsons L, Peterson ED,

Abstract
Concern has been raised that Asian-Americans may have a higher bleeding risk than Caucasian-Americans when treated with fibrinolytic and antithrombotic agents. To date there is limited evidence to support or refute this hypothesis or evaluate bleeding risk and its related outcomes in Caucasian-Americans versus Asian-Americans with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PPCI). We evaluated Asian-Americans and Caucasian-Americans with STEMI receiving reperfusion therapy in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI) 4 and 5 (n = 90,317). We studied risk-adjusted major bleeding and in-hospital mortality. Major bleeding rates after fibrinolysis were similar in Asian-Americans (n = 705) and Caucasian-Americans (n = 42,243, 11.1% vs 10.3%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69 to 1.36, p = 0.5002). Although the observed major bleeding rate was higher in Asian-Americans (n = 1,037) compared to Caucasian-Americans (n = 46,332) treated with PPCI (10.3% vs 7.8%, p = 0.0036), these rates differed only marginally after adjusting for baseline clinical variables (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.59). Overall adjusted mortality was similar in Asian-Americans and Caucasian-Americans when treated with fibrinolysis (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.65) or with PPCI (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.13). Major bleeding after PPCI or fibrinolysis was associated with similar increased risks for mortality in these ethic groups. In conclusion, despite suggestions to the contrary, Asian-Americans with STEMI treated with fibrinolysis or PPCI had similar bleeding and bleeding-related mortality risks compared to Caucasian-Americans. Given the genotypic and phenotypic differences between the 2 cohorts, similar studies in the rapidly growing Asian-American population are needed to confirm our findings and to understand the safety and effectiveness of newer potent antiplatelet and antithrombotic agents in patients with coronary syndromes.

PMID: 22221945 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Outcome of Noncardiac and Nonvascular Surgery in Patients With Mechanical Heart Valves.

Am J Cardiol. 2012 May 14;

Authors: Biteker M, Tekke?in AI, Can MM, Dayan A, Ilhan E, Türkmen FM

Abstract
There is a tendency to avoid noncardiac surgery in patients with mechanical heart valves (MHVs) owing to the increased risk of perioperative thromboembolism, infective endocarditis, and bleeding. We aimed to determine the risk of cardiac and noncardiac complications in patients with MHVs who underwent noncardiothoracic, nonvascular surgery. A total of 140 patients with MHVs (77 aortic, 46 mitral, and 17 double valve) and 1,200 patients with native valves (control group) were prospectively followed up for a minimum of 3 months after noncardiothoracic and nonvascular surgery. Patients with bioprostheses were excluded. Those patients aged >18 years who underwent an elective, non-outpatient, open surgical procedure were enrolled. Subcutaneous enoxaparin 1 mg/kg, twice daily, was used as bridging anticoagulation. The demographics, co-morbidities, and preoperative (medications, echocardiographic findings, laboratory results) and postoperative data were evaluated for their association with the occurrence of perioperative adverse events. The incidence of perioperative adverse cardiovascular (10.8% vs 10.7%, p = 0.985) and noncardiovascular (11.9% vs 11.4%, p = 0.989) events was similar in those patients with and without MHVs. Bleeding (18.6% vs 14.2%, p = 0.989), thromboembolism (3.6% vs 2%, p = 0.989), and mortality at 3 months (1.4% vs 1.3%, p = 0.825) were also similar for the 2 groups. In conclusion, with close follow-up and strict adherence to the guidelines, patients with MHVs and patients with native heart valves undergoing noncardiac and nonvascular surgery have a similar risk of mortality and morbidity.

PMID: 22591673 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Safety of "Bridging" With Eptifibatide for Patients With Coronary Stents Before Cardiac and Non-Cardiac Surgery.

Am J Cardiol. 2012 May 14;

Authors: Rassi AN, Blackstone E, Militello MA, Theodos G, Cavender MA, Sun Z, Ellis SG, Cho L

Abstract
Patients with previously implanted coronary stents are at risk for stent thrombosis if dual-antiplatelet therapy is prematurely discontinued. Bridging with a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor has been advocated as an alternative, with few supporting data. The aim of this study was to determine the safety of such a strategy by retrospectively analyzing bleeding in 100 consecutive patients with previously implanted coronary stents who were bridged to surgery with eptifibatide after discontinuing thienopyridine therapy. A propensity-matched control comparison was performed for a subgroup of 71 patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery. Blood transfusions were required in 65% in the bridged group versus 66% in the control group (p = 0.86). The mean numbers of units transfused were 4.84 ± 6.93 and 3.65 ± 7.46, respectively (p >0.25). Rates of return to the operating room for bleeding or tamponade were 10% and 2.9%, respectively (p = 0.085). Increased rates of transfusion were noted for patients who received concomitant aspirin and/or intravenous heparin infusion. In conclusion, there does not appear to be any increase in the need for blood transfusions or rate of return to the operating room for patients being bridged with eptifibatide when thienopyridines are discontinued in the perioperative period, but concomitant use of additional antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents may increase transfusions and delays to surgery. Clinicians who are considering this strategy must weigh the risks of stent thrombosis versus bleeding.

PMID: 22591672 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Cardiac Transplantation in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Am J Cardiol. 2012 May 14;

Authors: Kato TS, Takayama H, Yoshizawa S, Marboe C, Schulze PC, Farr M, Naka Y, Mancini D, Maurer MS

Abstract
Cardiac transplantation is a treatment option for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) who developed refractory heart failure and/or intractable arrhythmia. However, the pretransplant characteristics and post-transplant prognosis for patients with nondilated idiopathic HC has not yet fully elucidated. Therefore, we retrospectively reviewed 813 consecutive transplant recipients undergoing cardiac transplantation at Columbia University Medical Center from 1999 to 2010 and compared the clinical course of 41 patients with idiopathic HC with that of 373 patients with ischemic heart disease and 398 patients with other heart disease. The patients with HC were younger than those with ischemic heart disease (47.8 ± 14.0 vs 57.1 ± 9.4 years; p <0.0001). The proportion of patients undergoing ventricular assist devise surgery for bridge-to-transplant was lower in patients with HC than in those with ischemic heart disease or other heart disease (14.6% vs 31.1% vs 35.7%, all p <0.01). The post-transplant survival of those with HC was better than that for those with ischemic heart disease (90.1% vs 85.8% and 83.9% vs 67.1% at 1 and 5 years, respectively; p = 0.0359), although it was not significantly different from those with other heart disease. Proportional hazards analysis revealed that the subjects with HC had reduced post-transplant mortality (hazard ratio 0.4760, 95% confidential interval 0.1889 to 0.9762; p = 0.042) on univariate, but not multivariate, analysis. Most patients with HC had nondilated left ventricles (left ventricular end-diastolic dimension ?55 mm; n = 27), and post-transplant survival did not differ from that for those with dilated left ventricles (left ventricular end-diastolic dimension >55 mm; n = 14). In conclusion, the post-transplant survival of those with HC did not differ from those of the subjects who underwent transplant for other non-HC indications.

PMID: 22591671 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Meta-Analysis Comparing Bivalirudin Versus Heparin Monotherapy on Ischemic and Bleeding Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Am J Cardiol. 2012 May 14;

Authors: Bertrand OF, Jolly SS, Rao SV, Patel T, Belle L, Bernat I, Parodi G, Costerousse O, Mann T

Abstract
With femoral access, bivalirudin decreases risks of major bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and provides better net clinical benefit compared to unfractionated heparin (UFH) plus planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Whether this benefit exists compared to UFH monotherapy is less clear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare outcomes in patients undergoing transfemoral PCI with UFH or bivalirudin. Randomized trials (n = 3) and observational studies (n = 13) comparing bivalirudin to UFH monotherapy were reviewed. Primary outcomes were 30-day rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including death, myocardial infarction (MI), urgent revascularization, as well as all-cause mortality, MI, major bleeding, and blood transfusion. We collected data from 16 studies involving 32,492 patients undergoing PCI. Most observational studies were performed in the United States, whereas all randomized trials were done in Europe. Compared to UFH monotherapy, bivalirudin was associated with similar risk of MACEs (odds ratios [OR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 to 1.12), a substantial 45% relative decrease in major bleeding (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.72), and a trend in the decrease of transfusion (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.08). A decrease in mortality was seen in observational studies (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.85) but remained inconclusive in randomized trials (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.01). MI rate was similar with the 2 anticoagulants. In conclusion, in patients undergoing transfemoral PCI, the benefit of bivalirudin over UFH monotherapy is driven by a significant decrease in major bleeding with similar rates of MACE. As PCI practice moves toward other bleeding-avoidance strategies such as the radial approach, future studies should focus on the interaction between anticoagulant strategy and access-site choice.

PMID: 22591669 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Bivalirudin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the Anti-Thrombotic Strategy for Reduction of Myocardial Damage During Angioplasty-Bivalirudin vs Heparin Study).

Am J Cardiol. 2012 May 12;

Authors: Patti G, Pasceri V, D'Antonio L, D'Ambrosio A, Macrì M, Dicuonzo G, Colonna G, Montinaro A, Di Sciascio G

Abstract
Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is as effective as unfractionated heparin (UFH), with decreased bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bivalirudin versus UFH in selected PCI patients at high bleeding risk. Four hundred one consecutive patients who underwent PCI fulfilling ?1 enrollment criterion (age >75 years, chronic renal failure, and diabetes mellitus) were randomized to bivalirudin (bolus 0.75 mg/kg followed by infusion during the procedure; n = 198) or UFH (75 IU/kg; n = 203). In the overall population, 39% were aged >75 years, 22% had renal failure, 63% had diabetes, and 29% had acute coronary syndromes. The primary efficacy end point was the 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or target vessel revascularization). The primary safety end point was the occurrence of any bleeding or entry-site complications after PCI. All patients were preloaded with clopidogrel 600 mg. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used at the operators' discretion. Thirty-day major adverse cardiac event rates were 11.1% in the bivalirudin group and 8.9% in the UFH group (p = 0.56); the primary efficacy end point was reached mainly because of periprocedural myocardial infarction; 1 patient in the bivalirudin group had stent thrombosis. Occurrence of the primary safety end point was 1.5% in the bivalirudin group and 9.9% in the UFH group (p = 0.0001); this benefit was essentially driven by the prevention of entry-site hematomas >10 cm (0.5% vs 6.9%, p = 0.002). In conclusion, Anti-Thrombotic Strategy for Reduction of Myocardial Damage During Angioplasty-Bivalirudin vs Heparin (ARMYDA-7 BIVALVE) indicates that bivalirudin, compared with UFH, causes significantly lower bleeding and has a similar incidence of major adverse cardiac events in patients with older age, diabetes mellitus, or chronic renal failure who undergo PCI.

PMID: 22583760 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Prediction of Outcome by Highly Sensitive Troponin T in Outpatients With Chronic Systolic Left Ventricular Heart Failure.

Am J Cardiol. 2012 May 9;

Authors: Egstrup M, Schou M, Tuxen CD, Kistorp CN, Hildebrandt PR, Gustafsson F, Faber J, Goetze JP, Gustafsson I

Abstract
Our aim was to assess the prognostic impact of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) assay in an outpatient population with chronic systolic left ventricular heart failure (HF). Four hundred sixteen patients with chronic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction ?45% were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. In addition to hs-cTnT, plasma amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide was measured at baseline. Mean age was 71 years, 29% were women, 62% had coronary artery disease (CAD), mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 31%, and 57% had abnormal level of hs-cTnT. During 4.4 years of follow-up, 211 (51%) patients died. In multivariate Cox regression models, hs-cTnT was categorized as quartiles or dichotomized by the 99th percentile of a healthy population. Adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause mortality for quartiles 2 to 4, with quartile 1 as reference, were 1.4 (95% confidence interval 0.9 to 2.4, p = 0.16) for quartile 2, 1.7 (0.9 to 2.5, p = 0.12) for quartile 3, and 2.6 (1.6 to 4.4, p <0.001) for quartile 4 and 1.7 (1.2 to 2.5, p = 0.003) for abnormal versus normal level of hs-cTnT. In patients without CAD, quartile 4 of hs-cTnT was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 6.8. In conclusion, hs-cTnT is increased in most outpatients with chronic systolic HF and carries prognostic information beyond clinical parameters and amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. Increased hs-cTnT indicated a particularly deleterious prognosis in patients without CAD.

PMID: 22579083 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Early Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Rural Tertiary Care Center (from the Guthrie Health Off-Label Stent [GHOST] Registry).

Am J Cardiol. 2012 May 11;

Authors: Harjai KJ, Singh M, Boura J

Abstract
Early readmissions (ERs) impose a huge cost to the health care system, lower patients' quality of life, and may be an indicator of quality of initial care. We performed this single-center study to assess the incidence, predictors, and implications of 30-day readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a tertiary care rural setting. In 4,262 consecutive patients who underwent PCI, we evaluated 30-day readmission rates and assessed demographic, clinical, and angiographic correlates of ER. Using Cox regression analyses, we estimated the multivariable impact of an ER on 1-year all-cause mortality and major adverse events (MACEs; death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis). ER occurred in 486 patients (11.4%) including 366 (8.6%) for cardiac reasons and 120 (2.8%) for noncardiac reasons. Multivariable models predicting any readmission, cardiac readmission, and noncardiac readmission had c-statistic values of 0.63, 0.63, and 0.68, respectively. One-year mortality and MACEs were higher in the readmitted versus not readmitted patients (7.9% vs 3.2%, 18 vs 9.7%, p <0.0001 for the 2 comparisons). ER had a significant and independent impact on 1-year mortality (adjusted hazards ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 3.4) and MACEs (hazards ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 2.8). In conclusion, readmission within 30 days after PCI is common and frequently related to cardiac causes. Patients who require an ER after PCI have higher 1-year mortality and MACEs.

PMID: 22579345 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Comparison of Outcomes of Illicit Drug Users and Nonusers Hospitalized With Heart Failure.

Am J Cardiol. 2012 May 12;

Authors: Slim AM, Thomas H, Parish R, Mansi I

Abstract
The long-term effects of illicit drug use (IDU) on the clinical outcome of patients with heart failure (HF) are not well described. The objective of the present study was to describe the characteristics of patients with HF who used illicit drugs and to determine the effects of IDU on the clinical outcomes such as in-hospital mortality and hospital readmission for HF. A retrospective cohort study was conducted that included all patients admitted with HF from June 2003 to September 2004 and followed up until 2008 at a university hospital serving an at-risk population. The patients were divided into 2 groups: IDU and non-IDU according to self-reported use or positive laboratory results. The outcome measures were in-hospital mortality, HF readmission rate, interval to readmission for HF, and average brain natriuretic peptide and troponin levels throughout the follow-up period. Of 646 reviewed records, 542, representing 357 patients, were included in the present analysis. Of the 357 patients, 53 patients were in the IDU group and 304 were in the non-IDU group. Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis and Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that IDU was associated with a shorter interval to readmission for HF (hazard ratio 3.8, 95% confidence interval 2.3 to 10.7, p <0.0001) but not with in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.3 to 1.7, p = 0.4). Multiple linear regression analysis identified IDU as an independent variable for the HF readmission rate (p = 0.0001) but not for average brain natriuretic peptide or average troponin levels. In conclusion, the results of the present study have demonstrated that IDU was associated with a decreased interval to readmission for HF and greater HF readmission rates.

PMID: 22579343 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Influence of Resting Heart Rate on Mortality in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography (from the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health [LURIC] Study).

Am J Cardiol. 2012 May 12;

Authors: O Hartaigh B, Bosch JA, Pilz S, Loerbroks A, Kleber ME, Grammer TB, Fischer JE, Boehm BO, Thomas GN, März W

Abstract
Several epidemiologic studies have reported an association between elevated heart rate (HR) at rest and reduced survival. The usefulness of HR at rest in predicting end points in high-risk patients is yet to be definitively established. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relation between HR at rest with total and cardiovascular mortality in patients who underwent coronary angiography. A total of 3,316 Caucasian patients with available coronary angiograms were prospectively followed from 2001 to 2011 (median 9.9 years). The effect of HR at rest on total and cardiovascular mortality was explored, while correcting for a number of confounders. Patients in the highest quartile (HR at rest ?84 beats/min) had survival times reduced by 1.2 and 1.4 years for overall and cardiovascular mortality, respectively. Likewise, these patients had significantly elevated adjusted risk for total (hazard ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.67, p for trend <0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.78, p for trend = 0.004). In conclusion, HR at rest is an inexpensive, easily measured, and modifiable predictor of mortality.

PMID: 22579344 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of New Oral Anticoagulants (Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, Apixaban) Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Am J Cardiol. 2012 Apr 24;

Authors: Miller CS, Grandi SM, Shimony A, Filion KB, Eisenberg MJ

Abstract
New oral anticoagulants, including apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, have been developed as alternatives to warfarin, the standard oral anticoagulation therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants to those of warfarin in patients with AF. The published research was systematically searched for randomized controlled trials of >1 year in duration that compared new oral anticoagulants to warfarin in patients with AF. Random-effects models were used to pool efficacy and safety data across randomized controlled trials. Three studies, including 44,563 patients, were identified. Patients randomized to new oral anticoagulants had a decreased risk for all-cause stroke and systemic embolism (relative risk [RR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 0.92), ischemic and unidentified stroke (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.99), hemorrhagic stroke (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.68), all-cause mortality (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.95), and vascular mortality (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.98). Randomization to a new oral anticoagulant was associated with a lower risk for intracranial bleeding (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.66). Data regarding the risks for major bleeding (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.09) and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.72) were inconclusive. In conclusion, the new oral anticoagulants are more efficacious than warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with AF. With a decreased risk for intracranial bleeding, they appear to have a favorable safety profile, making them promising alternatives to warfarin.

PMID: 22537354 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Role of CHADS(2) Score in Evaluation of Thromboembolic Risk and Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Direct Current Cardioversion (from the ACUTE Trial Substudy).

Am J Cardiol. 2012 Apr 12;

Authors: Yarmohammadi H, Varr BC, Puwanant S, Lieber E, Williams SJ, Klostermann T, Jasper SE, Whitman C, Klein AL

Abstract
The CHADS(2) (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age >75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke or transient ischemic attack [2 points]) scoring scheme has been found to be a good predictor of stroke risk in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the value of the CHADS(2) scoring system in the risk stratification of patients with AF who undergo direct-current cardioversion has not yet been specifically investigated. In this study, a subgroup of 541 patients from the Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography (ACUTE) study who had AF for >48 hours and planned to undergo transesophageal echocardiography before direct-current cardioversion were enrolled. Each patient had a CHADS(2) score calculated. Of the patients with CHADS(2) scores of 0, 14 (10%) were found to have left atrial appendage thrombi on transesophageal echocardiography. After 6 months of follow up, patients with CHADS(2) scores of 3 to 6 showed a significantly higher mortality rate in comparison with patients with lower CHADS(2) scores (4.3% vs 0.5%, p = 0.004), despite their similar prevalence of left atrial appendage thrombus and stroke (thrombus: 13.4% vs 11.6%, p = 0.60; stroke: 0% vs 0.3%, p = 0.70). In conclusion, the CHADS(2) scoring system may be useful for predicting short-term mortality risk in patients with AF receiving elective direct-current cardioversion. However, in the preprocedural risk assessment of these patients, the CHADS(2) scoring system is not reliable in predicting risk for left atrial appendage thrombus formation, especially in patients with low CHADS(2) scores.

PMID: 22503581 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Comparison of Outcomes of Weekend Versus Weekday Admissions for Atrial Fibrillation.

Am J Cardiol. 2012 Apr 3;

Authors: Deshmukh A, Pant S, Kumar G, Bursac Z, Paydak H, Mehta JL

Abstract
Previous studies have identified a "weekend effect" in terms of a poor outcome for patients hospitalized with various acute medical conditions. The aim of our study was to investigate whether weekend admissions for atrial fibrillation (AF) result in worse outcomes than those admitted on weekdays. In the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2008 database, we identified a total of 86,497 discharges with a primary discharge diagnosis of AF. The use of a cardioversion procedure for AF on weekends was lower than that on a weekday (7.9% vs 16.2%; p <0.0001; odds ratio 0.5, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.55, p <0.0001). After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics and disease severity, the adjusted in-hospital mortality odds were greater for weekend admissions (odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.51; p <0.0001). The length of stay was significantly longer for weekend admissions. In conclusion, patients admitted with AF on weekends had lower odds of undergoing a cardioversion procedure and greater odds of dying.

PMID: 22481013 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]