Predictors of early readmission or death in elderly patients with heart failure.

Am Heart J. 2010 Aug;160(2):308-314

Authors: Muzzarelli S, Leibundgut G, Maeder MT, Rickli H, Handschin R, Gutmann M, Jeker U, Buser P, Pfisterer M, Brunner-La Rocca HP,

BACKGROUND: Contemporary heart failure (HF) patients are elderly and have a high rate of early rehospitalization or death, resulting in a high burden for both the patients and the health care system. Prior studies were focused on younger and less well-characterized patients. We aimed to identify predictors of early hospital readmission and death in elderly patients with HF. METHODS: Patients with chronic HF taking part in the TIME-CHF study (n = 614, age 77 +/- 8 years, 41% female, left ventricular ejection fraction 35% +/- 13%) were evaluated with respect to predictors of hospital readmission or death 30 and 90 days after inclusion. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and social variables were obtained at baseline and included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify predictors of early events. RESULTS: The rate of hospital readmission or death was high at 30 (11%) and 90 days (26%). The reason for hospitalization was HF in 33%, other cardiovascular in 32%, and noncardiovascular in 45% of the cases, respectively. Predictors of readmission or death at 30 days were angina, lower systolic blood pressure, anemia, more extensive edema, higher creatinine levels, and dry cough; and at 90 days were coronary artery disease, prior pacemaker implantation, high jugular venous pressure, pulmonary rales, prior abdominal surgery, older age, and depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Early hospital readmission or death was frequent among elderly HF patients. A very large proportion of readmissions were due to noncardiovascular causes. In addition to clinical signs of HF, comorbidities are important predictors of early events in elderly HF patients.

PMID: 20691837 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

[Read more →]

Predictors of early readmission or death in elderly patients with heart failure.

Am Heart J. 2010 Aug;160(2):308-314

Authors: Muzzarelli S, Leibundgut G, Maeder MT, Rickli H, Handschin R, Gutmann M, Jeker U, Buser P, Pfisterer M, Brunner-La Rocca HP,

BACKGROUND: Contemporary heart failure (HF) patients are elderly and have a high rate of early rehospitalization or death, resulting in a high burden for both the patients and the health care system. Prior studies were focused on younger and less well-characterized patients. We aimed to identify predictors of early hospital readmission and death in elderly patients with HF. METHODS: Patients with chronic HF taking part in the TIME-CHF study (n = 614, age 77 +/- 8 years, 41% female, left ventricular ejection fraction 35% +/- 13%) were evaluated with respect to predictors of hospital readmission or death 30 and 90 days after inclusion. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and social variables were obtained at baseline and included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify predictors of early events. RESULTS: The rate of hospital readmission or death was high at 30 (11%) and 90 days (26%). The reason for hospitalization was HF in 33%, other cardiovascular in 32%, and noncardiovascular in 45% of the cases, respectively. Predictors of readmission or death at 30 days were angina, lower systolic blood pressure, anemia, more extensive edema, higher creatinine levels, and dry cough; and at 90 days were coronary artery disease, prior pacemaker implantation, high jugular venous pressure, pulmonary rales, prior abdominal surgery, older age, and depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Early hospital readmission or death was frequent among elderly HF patients. A very large proportion of readmissions were due to noncardiovascular causes. In addition to clinical signs of HF, comorbidities are important predictors of early events in elderly HF patients.

PMID: 20691837 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

[Read more →]

Improving long-term risk prediction in patients with acute chest pain: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score is enhanced by selected nonnecrosis biomarkers.

Am Heart J. 2010 Jul;160(1):88-94

Authors: Eggers KM, Kempf T, Venge P, Wallentin L, Wollert KC, Lindahl B

BACKGROUND: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score is widely recommended for risk assessment in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the utility of this score for long-term risk prediction in unselected patients with acute chest pain and whether it might be improved by the integration of nonnecrosis biomarkers. METHODS: We calculated the GRACE risk score in 453 chest pain patients and assessed its value for risk assessment together with the additive prognostic information obtained from N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), and cystatin C. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 5.8 years, 92 patients (20.7%) had died. The GRACE risk score was significantly higher in patients who died (median 146 vs 93, P < .001) and provided a c-statistic regarding mortality of 0.78. A significant increase of the c-statistic was achieved only after addition of GDF-15 (c-statistic 0.81, P = .003) and, to a minor extent, after addition of cystatin C (c-statistic 0.81, P = .035). Assessment of the integrated discriminative improvement yielded similar results. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide had only limited incremental prognostic value, and C-reactive protein was not predictive for outcome. CONCLUSION: The GRACE risk score allows for the prediction of mortality in chest pain patients even after almost 6 years of follow-up. However, its predictive value could be further enhanced by the addition of selected nonnecrosis biomarkers, in particular GDF-15 or cystatin C.

PMID: 20598977 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

[Read more →]

Cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients >/=65 years of age.

Am Heart J. 2010 Jul;160(1):122-131

Authors: Sanders GD, Kong MH, Al-Khatib SM, Peterson ED

BACKGROUND: More than 80% of sudden cardiac deaths (SCDs) occur in patients >/=65 years old; the cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy in older patients remains unclear. We sought to examine the cost-effectiveness of ICD therapy in at-risk patients >/=65 years old. METHODS: We developed a Markov model to evaluate lifetime costs and benefits of ICD therapy compared with optimal medical therapy in patients >/=65 years of age with left ventricular dysfunction. Data were derived from the literature and existing clinical trials of primary prevention of SCD. Outcome measures included life years, quality-adjusted life years, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: Benefits and costs of ICD therapy in older individuals varied widely by clinical-trial population. In the 5 trials considered, for patients >/=65 years of age, ICDs demonstrated a life expectancy benefit compared with control therapy (incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranging from $37,031-$138,458 per quality-adjusted life year). For 75-year-old patients, the findings were qualitatively similar, although cost-effectiveness was reduced in all trial populations. In sensitivity analyses, cost-effectiveness of ICD therapy in older individuals depended upon the trial population, quality of life, device cost, and frequency of generator replacement. Sensitivity analyses on other variables did not change the results substantially. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of ICD therapy for primary prevention in older patients varies widely among trials. Given an aging US population and the high risk of SCD in these individuals, further studies of ICD therapy and their cost-effectiveness-specifically in older patients-are needed.

PMID: 20598982 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

[Read more →]

Low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents.

Am Heart J. 2010 Apr;159(4):684-690.e1

Authors: Li YJ, Rha SW, Chen KY, Poddar KL, Jin Z, Minami Y, Wang L, Dang Q, Li GP, Ramasamy S, Park JY, Choi CU, Kim JW, Kim EJ, Park CG, Seo HS, Oh DJ, Jeong MH, Ahn YK, Hong TJ, Park JS, Kim YJ, Hur SH, Seong IW, Chae JK, Cho MC, Bae JH, Choi DH, Jang YS, Chae IH, Kim HS, Kim CJ, Yoon JH, Ahn TH, Tahk SJ, Chung WS, Seung KB, Park SJ,

BACKGROUND: Whether low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is superior to unfractionated heparin (UFH) in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DESs) remains unclear. METHODS: A total of 3,372 STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI with DESs received either LMWH (n = 1,531 patients, subcutaneous enoxaparin 1 mg/kg, bid for 3-5 days plus reduced dose of UFH [50 U/kg] during PCI) or UFH alone (n = 1,841 patients, intravenous bolus injection of 5,000 U, followed by 24,000 U/d infusion for at least 48 hours). The bleeding events and clinical outcomes during in-hospital and at 8 months were compared. RESULTS: The incidences of major and minor bleeding events were similar between the 2 groups. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that LMWH group had lower incidences of cardiac death (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.55, 95% CI 0.39-0.77, P < .001), total death (adjusted OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.37-0.68, P < .001), and total major adverse cardiac events (adjusted OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.95, P = .017) at 8 months as compared with UFH group. Similar results were obtained across different subgroups including different DESs, age, and sex. CONCLUSIONS: The LMWH enoxaparin combined with reduced dose of UFH (50 U/kg) administration as an adjunctive antithrombotic therapy in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI with DESs seems to be safe and efficacious. However, randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm this conclusion.

PMID: 20362730 [PubMed - in process]

[Read more →]

The outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for stent thrombosis causing ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Am Heart J. 2010 Apr;159(4):672-6

Authors: Ergelen M, Gorgulu S, Uyarel H, Norgaz T, Aksu H, Ayhan E, Gunaydin ZY, Isik T, Tezel T

BACKGROUND: There are very few scientific data about the effectiveness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to stent thrombosis (ST). The purpose of the present study is to investigate the efficacy and outcome of primary PCI for STEMI due to ST in the largest consecutive patient population with ST reported to date. METHODS: A total of 2,644 consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI were retrospectively enrolled into the present study. The primary end point of this study was successful angiographic reperfusion defined as postprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade III flow. The secondary end points were cardiovascular death and reinfarction. RESULTS: Stent thrombosis was the cause of STEMI in 118 patients (4.4%). In patients with ST, angiographic success (postprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade III flow) was worse than in patients with de novo STEMI (76.3% vs 84.8%, P = .01). Patients with ST had significantly higher incidence of in-hospital cardiovascular mortality than patients with de novo STEMI (10.2% vs 5.3%, P = .02). In-hospital reinfarction rate was similar in both groups. In addition, long-term (mean 22 months) cardiovascular mortality and reinfarction rates were significantly higher in patients with ST compared with those without (17.4% vs 10.5%, P = .02 and 15.6% vs 9.5%, P = .03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Primary PCI for treatment of ST is less effective, and these patients are at increased risk for in-hospital and long-term mortality compared with patients undergoing primary PCI due to de novo STEMI.

PMID: 20362728 [PubMed - in process]

[Read more →]

Predicting left atrial thrombi in atrial fibrillation.

Am Heart J. 2010 Apr;159(4):665-71

Authors: Wysokinski WE, Ammash N, Sobande F, Kalsi H, Hodge D, McBane RD

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to determine whether CHADS(2) score is predictive of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Strategies for effective stroke prevention in AF require tools capable of identifying those patients at greatest risk for embolization of LAAT and most likely to benefit from warfarin. Nearly half of strokes in AF are due to noncardioembolic mechanisms for which antiplatelet therapy would be more appropriate. Previous attempts to develop such tools have been limited by including patients without proven cardioembolism. METHODS: Nonanticoagulated, nonvalvular AF patients with (cases) or without (controls) LAAT by transesophageal echocardiography were identified using Mayo Clinic Echocardiography and Cardioversion Unit Databases (Rochester, MN). Type and duration of AF, CHADS(2) score, and echocardiography measures were compared to determine variables predictive of LAAT. RESULTS: The CHADS(2) score was significantly higher for cases (n = 110, mean +/- SD 2.8 +/- 1.6) compared to controls (n = 387, 1.6 +/- 1.3). By multivariate analysis, independent predictors of LAAT included heart failure (HR 5.78, P < 0001), prior stroke/transient ischemic attack (HR 3.94, P < .0001), diabetes mellitus (HR 1.98, P = .015), permanent AF (HR 3.02, P < .05), AF duration (HR 2.24, P < .05), and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (HR 4.35, P = .005). Using these elements, a new scoring system provided cleaner case-control separation (C-index 0.90) and higher predictive power compared to CHADS(2) (C-index 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: The CHADS(2) score predicts the presence of LAAT in AF patients. Some, but not all, variables within this score are predictive of LAAT. By including only echo and clinical variables predictive of LAAT, our novel scoring system better identified those AF patients at greatest cardioembolic risk.

PMID: 20362727 [PubMed - in process]

[Read more →]

Evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes and its relationship to treatment.

Am Heart J. 2010 Apr;159(4):605-11

Authors: Jedrzkiewicz S, Goodman SG, Yan RT, Grondin FR, Gallo R, Welsh RC, Lai K, Huynh T, Yan AT,

BACKGROUND: In-hospital assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) is emphasized in current practice guidelines. There are limited data regarding the evaluation of LVEF and clinical characteristics and in-hospital management in the "real world." METHODS: Registries including the Canadian Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) I and II, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (main GRACE/expanded GRACE(2)), and Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events (CANRACE) enrolled 13,703 NSTE-ACS patients across Canada between 1999 and 2008. Patients were stratified by in-hospital LVEF measurement, and LVEF was categorized as normal, mildly, or moderately to severely impaired. We compared clinical characteristics, cardiac procedures, and clinical outcomes across these groups. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors independently associated with the assessment of LVEF. RESULTS: Overall, 8,116 patients (59.2%) had LVEF measurement, and of the 7,667 patients with available LVEF data, 4,470 (58.3%) had normal, 1,916 (25%) mildly impaired, and 1,281 (16.7%) moderately to severely impaired LVEF. Patients with LVEF assessment more frequently (all P < .001) underwent cardiac catheterization, percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass surgery, and had higher (both P < .001) rates of myocardial (re) infarction and heart failure. In-hospital reinfarction, higher Killip class, abnormal biomarker, hospital stay >10 days, and on-site cardiac catheterization facility were independently associated with LVEF assessment. Despite increasing LVEF assessment over time (P for trend < .001), 31.2% of patients in the most recent registry (2008) had no in-hospital LVEF assessment. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital LVEF assessment is not performed in many NSTE-ACS patients. The LVEF assessment, associated with increased use of evidence-based therapies and invasive cardiac procedures, was obtained more frequently in patients with myocardial (re) infarction, heart failure on presentation, and prolonged hospital stay.

PMID: 20362719 [PubMed - in process]

[Read more →]

QRS prolongation in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Am Heart J. 2010 Apr;159(4):593-8

Authors: Baslaib F, Alkaabi S, Yan AT, Yan RT, Dorian P, Nanthakumar K, Casanova A, Goodman SG,

BACKGROUND: QRS prolongation with or without bundle branch block (BBB) has been associated with adverse outcome in myocardial infarction; we examined the relationship between QRS duration and outcome in a broad spectrum of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHOD AND RESULTS: Core laboratory evaluation of the presenting electrocardiogram in Canadian ACS Registry patients (n = 5,003) showed 4,289 (85.7%) had QRS <120 milliseconds, 202 (4.0%) patients had QRS > or =120 milliseconds without BBB, 262 (5.2%) had left BBB (LBBB), and 250 (5.0%) had right BBB. Compared to patients with QRS <120 milliseconds, patients with QRS > or =120 milliseconds without BBB had higher in-hospital (3.5% vs 1.9%, odds ratio [OR] 1.87, 95% CI 0.85-4.09, P = .12) and 1-year mortality (14.9% vs 7.7%, OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.38-3.18, P = .001). In-hospital and 1-year mortality was significantly higher in patients with BBB (eg, LBBB compared with QRS <120 milliseconds) (5.0% vs 1.9%, OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.49-4.94, P = .001, and 23.8% vs 7.7%, OR 3.74, 95% CI 2.72-5.13, P < .001). Analyzed as a continuous variable and after adjustment for validated prognosticators, QRS duration was an independent predictor of 1-year death (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06-1.16, P < .001) and death/myocardial infarction (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.11, P = .003). However, when using clinically applicable QRS duration evaluation, only LBBB was an independent predictor of 1-year mortality (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.28-2.90, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting with a broad spectrum of suspected ACS, QRS prolongation-particularly in the setting of LBBB-is an independent predictor of in-hospital and 1-year mortality.

PMID: 20362717 [PubMed - in process]

[Read more →]

In-hospital mortality in 13,263 survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Canada.

Am Heart J. 2010 Apr;159(4):577-583.e1

Authors: Redpath C, Sambell C, Stiell I, Johansen H, Williams K, Samie R, Green M, Gollob M, Lemery R, Birnie D

BACKGROUND: There is a substantial mortality rate in patients admitted alive after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The primary objective of our study was to examine trends in in-hospital survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors in Canada between 1994 and 2004. The secondary objective was to examine predictors of in-hospital survival in these patients. METHODS: Data on hospital admissions from April 1, 1994, to March 31, 2004, were obtained from the Health Person-oriented Information Database, maintained by Statistics Canada. We included all patients with a primary diagnosis of cardiac arrest who survived to hospital admission. We assessed survival to hospital discharge in all patients admitted alive. RESULTS: In Canada, 13,263 patients survived community arrest between 1994 and 2004. The annual incidence of hospital admission after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest decreased by 33%, from 5.37 per 100,000 in 1994 to 3.63 per 100,000 in 2004 (P < .0001 for trend). Subsequently, 5,045 patients (38.03%) survived to hospital discharge. The survival rate did not change during the duration of the study. Invasive coronary artery disease management was associated with a greatly increased chance of survival (odds ratio 21.98, 95% CI 17.62-27.42). Also male gender, heart failure, and acute myocardial ischemia were independent positive predictors of survival to hospital discharge; greater age and comorbidities were negative predictors of survival. Finally, there were significant interprovincial variations in survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: Our study, the largest of its kind, has 4 main findings. Firstly, between 1993 and 2004, there was a significant and steady decline in admission rates after community cardiac arrest. Second, there was no change in the in-hospital survival rates. Thirdly, invasive management of coronary artery disease was associated with a greatly improved chance of survival, and finally, there were important regional variations in survival rates.

PMID: 20362715 [PubMed - in process]

[Read more →]

Related Articles

Differences in mortality in acute coronary syndrome symptom clusters.

Am Heart J. 2010 Mar;159(3):392-8

Authors: Riegel B, Hanlon AL, McKinley S, Moser DK, Meischke H, Doering LV, Davidson P, Pelter MM, Dracup K

BACKGROUND: The timely and accurate identification of symptoms of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a challenge for patients and clinicians. It is unknown whether response times and clinical outcomes differ with specific symptoms. We sought to identify which ACS symptoms are related-symptom clusters-and to determine if sample characteristics, response times, and outcomes differ among symptom cluster groups. METHODS: In a multisite randomized clinical trial, 3522 patients with known cardiovascular disease were followed up for 2 years. During follow-up, 331 (11%) had a confirmed ACS event. In this group, 8 presenting symptoms were analyzed using cluster analysis. Differences in symptom cluster group characteristics, delay times, and outcomes were examined. RESULTS: The sample was predominantly male (67%), older (mean 67.8, S.D. 11.6 years), and white (90%). Four symptom clusters were identified: Classic ACS characterized by chest pain; Pain Symptoms (neck, throat, jaw, back, shoulder, arm pain); Stress Symptoms (shortness of breath, sweating, nausea, indigestion, dread, anxiety); and Diffuse Symptoms, with a low frequency of most symptoms. Those in the Diffuse Symptoms cluster tended to be older (P = .08) and the Pain Symptoms group was most likely to have a history of angina (P = .01). After adjusting for differences, the Diffuse Symptoms cluster demonstrated higher mortality at 2 years (17%) than the other 3 clusters (2%-5%, P < .001), although prehospital delay time did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: Most ACS symptoms occur in groups or clusters. Uncharacteristic symptom patterns may delay diagnosis and treatment by clinicians even when patients seek care rapidly. Knowledge of common symptom patterns may facilitate rapid identification of ACS.

PMID: 20211300 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

[Read more →]

Related Articles

Rivaroxaban-once daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation: rationale and design of the ROCKET AF study.

Am Heart J. 2010 Mar;159(3):340-347.e1

Authors:

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common significant cardiac arrhythmia, increases the risk of stroke, particularly in the elderly. Warfarin is effective in reducing stroke risk but is burdensome to patients and is difficult to control. Rivaroxaban is an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor in advanced development as an alternative to warfarin for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. METHODS: ROCKET AF is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, event-driven trial, which aims to establish the noninferiority of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular AF who have a history of stroke or at least 2 additional independent risk factors for future stroke. Patients are randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban, 20 mg once daily (od), or dose-adjusted warfarin titrated to a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.5 (range 2.0-3.0, inclusive) using point-of-care INR devices to receive true or sham INR values, depending on the study drug allocation. The primary efficacy end point is a composite of all-cause stroke and noncentral nervous system systemic embolism. The primary safety end point is the composite of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events. Over 14,000 patients have been randomized at 1,100 sites across 45 countries, and will be followed until 405 primary outcome events are observed. CONCLUSION: The ROCKET AF study will determine the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban as an alternative to warfarin for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with AF.

PMID: 20211293 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

[Read more →]

Propranolol and the risk of hospitalized myopathy: Translating chemical genomics findings into population-level hypotheses.

Am Heart J. 2010 Mar;159(3):428-433

Authors: Setoguchi S, Higgins JM, Mogun H, Mootha VK, Avorn J

BACKGROUND: A recent large-scale, chemical screening study raised the hypothesis that propranolol may increase the risk of myopathy. We tested this hypothesis in a large population to assess whether (1) propranolol use is associated with an increased risk of myopathy and (2) the concurrent use of propranolol with a statin may further increase risk of myopathy. METHODS: New users of propranolol and other beta-blockers (BBs) aged >/=65 were identified using data from Medicare and drug benefit programs in 2 states (1994-2005). The primary end point studied was hospitalization for myopathy or rhabdomyolysis. We used stratified Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the multivariate-adjusted effect of propranolol compared to other BBs and controlled for demographic variables, risk factors for myopathy, other comorbidities, and health service use measures. We also assessed whether co-use of propranolol and statin further increases the risk, by including an interaction term for use of propranolol and statins. RESULTS: We identified 9,304 initiators of propranolol and 130,070 initiators of other BBs and found 30 cases of hospitalized myopathy in 15,477 person-years (PYs) of propranolol use and 523 in 343,132 PYs of other BB use. Comparing propranolol with other BB users, the adjusted hazard ratio was 1.45 (95% CI 1.00-2.11) for myopathy and 1.48 (95% CI 0.82-2.67) for rhabdomyolysis. We could not detect interaction between propranolol and statins due to limited power. Similar results were observed when propranolol users were compared to other antihypertensive drug users. CONCLUSIONS: Propranolol may be associated with a 45% increased risk of hospitalized myopathy in the elderly. Our study illustrates how results from in vitro chemical screens can be translated into hypotheses about drug toxicity at the population level.

PMID: 20211305 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

[Read more →]

In-hospital management of patients with atrial flutter.

Am Heart J. 2010 Mar;159(3):370-376

Authors: Lapointe NM, Sun JL, Kaplan S

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the use of drugs or procedures for management of atrial flutter (AFl) in routine clinical practice. We describe the extent of use of conversion therapies during AFl hospitalizations. METHODS: We examined hospitalizations for primary diagnoses of AFl using hospital claims from January 2000 to December 2004. Patients who received antiarrhythmic drugs, ablation, and/or electrical cardioversion for AFl were categorized as receiving a conversion therapy. Characteristics associated with use of conversion therapy versus no conversion therapy were determined. RESULTS: The study cohort included 19,825 hospitalizations. Of these, 13,059 (65.9%) included in-hospital use of >/=1 conversion therapies. Care by a noncardiologist (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.37, 95% CI 0.33-0.41), female sex (adjusted OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79-0.90), nonwhite race (adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.92), and increasing age >70 years (adjusted OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.85-0.91) were associated with lower odds of conversion versus no-conversion therapy. Cardiomyopathy (adjusted OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.17-1.51), heart failure (adjusted OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.06-1.28), coronary artery disease (adjusted OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05-1.22), secondary diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (adjusted OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.18-1.38), and hospitalization in 2000 or 2001 versus later years (adjusted OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.12-1.33) were associated with greater odds of conversion therapy versus no conversion therapy. CONCLUSION: One or more methods of conversion to sinus rhythm were used in two thirds of the hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of AFl. Greater use of conversion therapies in patients with other heart disease were expected; however, lower use among elderly persons, females, and racial minorities may indicate some disparities in use and warrant further study.

PMID: 20211297 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

[Read more →]

Routine use of fondaparinux in acute coronary syndromes: A 2-year multicenter experience.

Am Heart J. 2010 Feb;159(2):190-198

Authors: Schiele F, Meneveau N, Seronde MF, Descotes-Genon V, Dutheil J, Chopard R, Ecarnot F, Bassand JP,

BACKGROUND: Fondaparinux has recently been approved in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The primary aim of this study was to describe the changes in use of anticoagulants between January 2006 and December 2007. The secondary aim was to compare 30-day mortality and rate of a combined end point (30-day death or major bleeding) according to the initial and final anticoagulant agent used. METHODS: The rates of use of unfractionated heparin (UFH), enoxaparin, and fondaparinux were compared by periods of 1 month in a multicenter registry. The initial anticoagulant (first used at admission), the final anticoagulant (last used during hospitalization), and switches in anticoagulation were recorded. Temporal trends in monthly use of each anticoagulant were assessed; 30-day mortality rates and the combined end point were compared according to initial and final anticoagulant. RESULTS: Among 2,874 patients included, the first anticoagulant used was UFH in 26%, enoxaparin in 59%, and fondaparinux in 15%. Respective figures for final anticoagulant were 17%, 56%, and 27%. Although 3 centers did not use fondaparinux (community centers with catheterization laboratory), the overall rate of use of fondaparinux, as initial and final anticoagulant, increased at the expense of the use of enoxaparin. We observed a growing proportion of patients with a switch from UFH to either enoxaparin or fondaparinux, ranging from 5% at the beginning to 25% at the end of the study. Patients treated with UFH were older, had more comorbidities, were at higher risk, and received fewer guidelines-recommended treatments. In patients submitted to angioplasty and treated with fondaparinux, a bolus of 60 IU/kg of UFH was added. After adjustment, 30-day mortality and combined end point rates were higher in patients treated with UFH. Irrespective of the type of acute coronary syndromes, patients treated with enoxaparin or fondaparinux had similar outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2006 and 2007, the use of fondaparinux in patients with acute coronary syndromes increased considerably, either because it was used instead of enoxaparin or because of a switch from UFH. Adjusted mortality in patients treated with fondaparinux was lower than with UFH and similar to enoxaparin.

PMID: 20152216 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

[Read more →]