Virtual Journal Club

Please note: This website is for discussion purposes only. The information provided at this website is not intended to provide treatment advice, or to diagnose or treat any medical disorder. The creator of this website is not responsible for events that occur as a result of decisions made based on the information presented here.

Citations powered by PubMed

Comparison of transient elastography, serum markers and clinical signs for the diagnosis of compensated cirrhosis.

August 28th, 2010 · Start a Discussion

Related Articles

Comparison of transient elastography, serum markers and clinical signs for the diagnosis of compensated cirrhosis.

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Sep;25(9):1562-8

Authors: Malik R, Lai M, Sadiq A, Farnan R, Mehta S, Nasser I, Challies T, Schuppan D, Afdhal N

Abstract Background and Aims: Non-invasive diagnosis of compensated cirrhosis is important. We therefore compared liver stiffness by transient elastography, APRI score, AST/ALT ratio, hyaluronic acid and clinical signs to determine which modality performed best at identifying compensated cirrhosis. Methods: Patients undergoing evaluation at a single center were recruited and had clinical, serological, endoscopy, radiological imaging, liver stiffness measurement and liver biopsy. Patients were stratified into cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic. Results: In 404 patients (124 cirrhosis), transient elastography was diagnostically superior to the other modalities yielding an AUC 0.9 +/- 0.04 compared with hyaluronic acid (AUC 0.81 +/- 0.04: P < 0.05), clinical signs (AUC 0.74 +/- 0.04: P < 0.05), APRI score (AUC 0.71 +/- 0.03: P < 0.05) and AST/ALT ratio (AUC 0.66 +/- 0.03: P < 0.05). The optimum cut-off for transient elastography was 12 kPa giving a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 87% for cirrhosis. In 238 hepatitis C patients (87 cirrhosis), transient elastography yielded an AUC 0.899 +/- 0.02 for cirrhosis and in 166 non-HCV patients (37 cirrhosis) the results were similar with an AUC 0.928 +/- 0.03; with transient elastography being superior to HA, APRI, AST/ALT and clinical signs for all etiologies of cirrhosis (P < 0.05 for all). Importantly, transient elastography was statistically superior at identifying cirrhosis in 38 biopsy proven Childs Pugh A cirrhotics with no clinical, biochemical or radiological features of cirrhosis or portal hypertension (AUC 0.87 +/- 0.04). Conclusion: Transient elastography accurately identified compensated cirrhosis; a liver stiffness of >12 kPa represents an important clinical measurement for the diagnosis of cirrhosis.

PMID: 20796156 [PubMed - in process]

Link to Abstract at PubMed

Share


Tags: J Gastroenterol Hepatol

0 responses so far ↓

  • There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.

Discuss this article