Virtual Journal Club

Please note: This website is for discussion purposes only. The information provided at this website is not intended to provide treatment advice, or to diagnose or treat any medical disorder. The creator of this website is not responsible for events that occur as a result of decisions made based on the information presented here.

Citations powered by PubMed

Code Status Discussions at Hospital Admission Are Not Associated With Patient and Surrogate Satisfaction With Hospital Care: Results From the Multicenter Hospitalist Study.

August 21st, 2010 · Start a Discussion

Related Articles

Code Status Discussions at Hospital Admission Are Not Associated With Patient and Surrogate Satisfaction With Hospital Care: Results From the Multicenter Hospitalist Study.

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2010 Aug 16;

Authors: Anderson WG, Pantilat SZ, Meltzer D, Schnipper J, Kaboli P, Wetterneck TB, Gonzales D, Arora V, Zhang J, Auerbach AD

Background: Physicians may avoid code status discussions for fear of decreasing patient or surrogate satisfaction. METHODS: Charts of patients admitted to medical services at 6 university hospitals were reviewed for documentation of a code status discussion in the first 24 hours of admission. Satisfaction with care provided during the hospitalization was assessed by telephone 1 month after discharge. RESULTS: Of the 11 717 patients with 1-month follow-up, 1090 (9.3%) had a code status discussion documented. Patient or surrogate satisfaction did not differ by whether a discussion was documented. The lack of association persisted after adjusting for patient's severity of illness and using propensity adjustment for likelihood of having a discussion. CONCLUSIONS: Discussing code status on admission to the inpatient setting did not affect patient or surrogate satisfaction.

PMID: 20713421 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Link to Abstract at PubMed

Share


Tags: Am J Hosp Palliat Care

0 responses so far ↓

  • There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.

Discuss this article