Virtual Journal Club

Please note: This website is for discussion purposes only. The information provided at this website is not intended to provide treatment advice, or to diagnose or treat any medical disorder. The creator of this website is not responsible for events that occur as a result of decisions made based on the information presented here.

Citations powered by PubMed

Effectiveness of Alcohol-Based Hand Rubs for Removal of Clostridium difficile Spores from Hands.

May 3rd, 2010 · Start a Discussion

Effectiveness of Alcohol-Based Hand Rubs for Removal of Clostridium difficile Spores from Hands.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Apr 29;

Authors: Jabbar U, Leischner J, Kasper D, Gerber R, Sambol SP, Parada JP, Johnson S, Gerding DN

Background. Alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHRs) are an effective means of decreasing the transmission of bacterial pathogens. Alcohol is not effective against Clostridium difficile spores. We examined the retention of C. difficile spores on the hands of volunteers after ABHR use and the subsequent transfer of these spores through physical contact. Methods. Nontoxigenic C. difficile spores were spread on the bare palms of 10 volunteers. Use of 3 ABHRs and chlorhexidine soap-and-water washing were compared with plain water rubbing alone for removal of C. difficile spores. Palmar cultures were performed before and after hand decontamination by means of a plate stamping method. Transferability of C. difficile after application of ABHR was tested by having each volunteer shake hands with an uninoculated volunteer. Results. Plain water rubbing reduced palmar culture counts by a mean (+/- standard deviation [SD]) of 1.57 +/- 0.11 log(10) colony-forming units (CFU) per cm(2), and this value was set as the zero point for the other products. Compared with water washing, chlorhexidine soap washing reduced spore counts by a mean (+/-SD) of 0.89 +/- 0.34 log(10) CFU per cm(2); among the ABHRs, Isagel accounted for a reduction of 0.11 +/- 0.20 log(10) CFU per cm(2) ([Formula: see text]), Endure for a reduction of 0.37 +/- 0.42 log(10) CFU per cm(2) ([Formula: see text]), and Purell for a reduction of 0.14 +/- 0.33 log(10) CFU per cm(2) ([Formula: see text]). There were no statistically significant differences between the reductions achieved by the ABHRs; only Endure had a reduction statistically different from that for water control rubbing ([Formula: see text]). After ABHR use, handshaking transferred a mean of 30% of the residual C. difficile spores to the hands of recipients. Conclusions. Hand washing with soap and water is significantly more effective at removing C. difficile spores from the hands of volunteers than are ABHRs. Residual spores are readily transferred by a handshake after use of ABHR.

PMID: 20429659 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Link to Abstract at PubMed

Share


Tags: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

0 responses so far ↓

  • There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.

Discuss this article