2010 February

ICU procedures of the critically ill.

Feb 282010

ICU procedures of the critically ill.

Respirology. 2009 Nov;14(8):1092-7

Authors: Phua GC, Wahidi MM

Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients often require urgent, high-risk diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. However, they are particularly vulnerable to procedural complications due to the severity and instability of their illnesses. We discuss the complications associated with bronchoscopy, percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy, pleural interventions for example thoracentesis and chest tube placement, central venous catheterization and pulmonary artery catheterization. Invasive procedures are frequently performed in critically ill patients. It is important for the operator to be familiar with the specific complications of each procedure, as well as steps to take in order to enhance safety and reduce adverse events. High standards of training and credentialing are crucial to ensure that the ICU physicians are proficient in performing these procedures.

PMID: 19909459 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Link to Article at PubMed

Is external jugular vein cannulation feasible in emergency care? A randomised study in open heart surgery patients.

Resuscitation Start a Discussion »

Feb 282010

Is external jugular vein cannulation feasible in emergency care? A randomised study in open heart surgery patients.

Resuscitation. 2009 Dec;80(12):1361-4

Authors: Lahtinen P, Musialowicz T, Hyppölä H, Kiviniemi V, Kurola J

The optimal intravenous catheterisation site for emergencies is unknown. The external jugular vein might be preferable route compared to cubital veins in emergencies due to more rapid circulation time to heart and faster cardiac responses. However, the feasibility of the different venous catheterisation sites has not been compared in relation to catheterisation time and success rate. METHODS: We examined the time differences and success rates of external jugular compared to antecubital vein catheterisations. 32 paramedics and 28 emergency department residents performed external jugular and antecubital venous catheterisations on anesthetized patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery. The primary outcome was catheterisation time and the secondary outcomes the failure rate and catheterisation times needed to succeed. RESULTS: Antecubital venous catheterisation was faster (113+/-89s) compared to external jugular vein catheterisation (156+/-112s), p=0.008 and the success rate was higher (93% compared to 68%, respectively, p=0.001). Less attempts were needed for antecubital vein catheterisations compared to external jugular vein catheterisations (p=0.002). For the antecubital vein, subjects needed two attempts in 6 patients and three attempts in 6 patients. For the external jugular vein, subjects needed two attempts in 13 patients and three attempts in 20 patients. Two (6%) paramedics and two (7%) residents failed to catheterise the antecubital vein. Nine (28%) paramedics and 10 (36%) residents failed to catheterise the external jugular vein. CONCLUSIONS: Antecubital vein catheterisation was faster and had a superior success rate compared to external jugular vein catheterisation.

PMID: 19804930 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Link to Article at PubMed

Laboratory investigation of thrombophilia: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Semin Thromb Hemost Start a Discussion »

Feb 282010

Laboratory investigation of thrombophilia: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Semin Thromb Hemost. 2009 Oct;35(7):695-710

Authors: Favaloro EJ, McDonald D, Lippi G

Thrombophilia can be broadly defined as an increased tendency toward hypercoagulability and venous thrombosis. There are several defined risk factors for thrombosis, and these are generally distinguished as either acquired or congenital, although sometimes this distinction is blurred because of interrelationships. Congenital risk factors include deficiencies or defects in natural anticoagulants, such as antithrombin, Protein C and Protein S, and genetic polymorphisms such as prothrombin G20210A and cleavage-resistant forms of factor V (in particular factor V Leiden), that lead to a condition commonly known as activated protein C resistance. Acquired risk factors include antiphospholipid antibodies, detected as lupus anticoagulants and/or anticardiolipin antibodies and/or anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-I antibodies. High levels of clotting factors, dysfibrinogenemia, hyperhomocysteinemia, prolonged immobilization, increasing age, surgery, trauma, cancer, obesity, poor nutrition, pregnancy, oral contraceptives, and hormone replacement therapy comprise just some of the other risk factors. Each of these elements constitutes a component of increased risk, which is compounded when concomitant. There is ongoing debate regarding relative and compound risks, the value of laboratory screening, whom and when to screen for these markers, which tests and methodologies to use, and the form and duration of therapeutic management. The current article explores several important issues primarily from a scientific perspective and predominantly related to laboratory testing. Many of these issues appear to be simply overlooked by some clinicians managing patients with thromboses. In brief, although there is potential significance in testing for various thrombophilia-associated markers, this value is limited and greatly diminishes when inappropriately applied. The application of excessive or inappropriate thrombophilia testing is of particular concern, and the net effect of current worldwide testing trends is likely to be more detrimental than beneficial. In short, it is likely that current generalized testing is simply doing more harm than good, and thus that ordering practice requires scrutiny.

PMID: 20013536 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Link to Article at PubMed

Clostridium difficile is associated with poor outcomes in patients with cirrhosis: A national and tertiary center perspective.

Am J Gastroenterol Start a Discussion »

Feb 282010

Clostridium difficile is associated with poor outcomes in patients with cirrhosis: A national and tertiary center perspective.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jan;105(1):106-13

Authors: Bajaj JS, Ananthakrishnan AN, Hafeezullah M, Zadvornova Y, Dye A, McGinley EL, Saeian K, Heuman D, Sanyal AJ, Hoffmann RG

OBJECTIVES: Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) is associated with antibiotic use, acid suppression, and hospitalization, all of which occur frequently in cirrhosis. The aim was to define the effect of CDAD on outcomes and identify risk factors for its development in cirrhosis. METHODS: Case-control studies using the de-identified national (Nationwide Inpatient Sample, NIS) and an identified liver transplant center database of hospitalized cirrhotics with and without CDAD were performed. The NIS 2005 was queried for mortality, charges, and length of stay (LOS) in cirrhotics with/without CDAD. Outcomes of cirrhosis and infections were also analyzed. In the transplant center database, risk factors for CDAD were defined in hospitalized cirrhotics with/without CDAD who were age matched in a 1:2 ratio. RESULTS: The NIS 2005 included 1,165 cirrhotics with and 82,065 without CDAD. Cirrhotics with CDAD had a significantly higher mortality (13.8% vs. 8.2%, P<0.001), LOS (14.4 days vs. 6.7 days, P<0.001), and charges ($79,351 vs. $35,686, P<0.001) compared with those without CDAD. On multivariate analysis, CDAD was associated with higher mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-1.85), charges, and LOS despite controlling for cirrhosis complications and infections. In the transplant center database, 54 cirrhotics with and 108 cirrhotics without CDAD were included. Outpatient spontaneous bacterial peritonitis prophylaxis (35% vs. 13%, P=0.01), inpatient antibiotic (63% vs. 35%, P=0.0001), and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use (74% vs. 31%, P=0.0001) were significantly higher in those with CDAD. CONCLUSIONS: Cirrhotics with CDAD have a higher mortality, LOS, and charges on the NIS 2005 compared with those without CDAD. Antibiotic and PPI use are risk factors for CDAD development in hospitalized cirrhotics.

PMID: 19844204 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Link to Article at PubMed

Prospective multicentre systematic guideline-based management of patients referred to the Syncope Units of general hospitals.

Europace Start a Discussion »

Feb 282010

Prospective multicentre systematic guideline-based management of patients referred to the Syncope Units of general hospitals.

Europace. 2010 Jan;12(1):109-18

Authors: Brignole M, Ungar A, Casagranda I, Gulizia M, Lunati M, Ammirati F, Del Rosso A, Sasdelli M, Santini M, Maggi R, Vitale E, Morrione A, Francese GM, Vecchi MR, Giada F,

AIMS: Although an organizational model for syncope management facilities was proposed in the 2004 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), its implementation in clinical practice and its effectiveness are largely unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective study enrolled 941 consecutive patients referred to the Syncope Units of nine general hospitals from 15 March 2008 to 15 September 2008. A median of 15 patients per month were examined in each unit, but the five older units had a two-fold higher volume of activity than the four newer ones (instituted <1 year before): 23 vs. 12, P = 0.02. These figures give an estimated volume of 163 and 60 patients per 100,000 inhabitants per year, respectively. Referrals: 60% from out-of-hospital services, 11% immediate and 13% delayed referrals from the Emergency Department, and 16% hospitalized patients. A diagnosis was established on initial evaluation in 191 (21%) patients and early by means of 2.9 +/- 1.6 tests in 541 (61%) patients. A likely reflex cause was established in 67%, orthostatic hypotension in 4%, cardiac in 6% and non-syncopal in 5% of the cases. The cause of syncope remained unexplained in 159 (18%) patients, despite a mean of 3.5 +/- 1.8 tests per patient. These latter patients were older, more frequently had structural heart disease or electrocardiographic abnormalities, unpredictable onset of syncope due to the lack of prodromes, and higher OESIL and EGSIS risk scores than the other groups of patients. The mean costs of diagnostic evaluation was 209 euro per outpatient and 1073 euro per inpatient. The median cost of hospital stay was 2990 euro per patient. CONCLUSION: We documented the current practice of syncope management in specialized facilities that have adopted the management model proposed by the ESC. The results are useful for those who wish to replicate this model in other hospitals. Syncope remains unexplained during in-hospital evaluation in more complex cases at higher risk.

PMID: 19948566 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Link to Article at PubMed

The nuts and bolts of subcutaneous insulin therapy in non-critical care hospital settings.

Postgrad Med Start a Discussion »

Feb 282010

The nuts and bolts of subcutaneous insulin therapy in non-critical care hospital settings.

Postgrad Med. 2010 Jan;122(1):153-62

Authors: Juneja R, Foster SA, Whiteman D, Fahrbach JL

In non-critical care settings, patients with hyperglycemia experience increased morbidity and mortality. Despite an increased recognition of the importance of treating inpatient hyperglycemia, many patients are still not adequately controlled. Insulin offers flexibility to address varying glucose levels and therefore is the preferred therapy to achieve recommended targets and manage hyperglycemia. Traditional sliding-scale insulin regimens often ineffectively control blood glucose levels as they are unable to mimic physiologic insulin secretion. Basal-bolus insulin regimens are recognized as a more effective way to correct hyperglycemia in non-critical care settings and a systematic glycemic control program is necessary to address hyperglycemia while minimizing hypoglycemia. Critical components of these programs include addressing barriers to glycemic control, understanding varying needs of different types of patients, and developing standardized subcutaneous insulin orders to achieve target glucose levels. This article provides strategies for using insulin in non-critical care settings to facilitate glycemic control.

PMID: 20107299 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Link to Article at PubMed

Older Entries

February 2010
M	T	W	T	F	S	S
« Jan				Mar »
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28