Virtual Journal Club

Please note: This website is for discussion purposes only. The information provided at this website is not intended to provide treatment advice, or to diagnose or treat any medical disorder. The creator of this website is not responsible for events that occur as a result of decisions made based on the information presented here.

Citations powered by PubMed

A Prediction Rule for Estimating the Risk of Bacteremia in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

June 28th, 2009 · Start a Discussion

Related Articles

A Prediction Rule for Estimating the Risk of Bacteremia in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jun 25;

Authors: Falguera M, Trujillano J, Caro S, Menéndez R, Carratalà J, Ruiz-González A, Vilà M, García M, Porcel JM, Torres A,

Background. We endeavored to construct a simple score based entirely on epidemiological and clinical variables that would stratify patients who require hospital admission because of community-acquired pneumonia into groups with a low or high risk of developing bacteremia. Methods. Derivation and internal validation cohorts were obtained by retrospective analysis of a database that included 3116 consecutive patients with community-acquired pneumonia from 2 university hospitals. Potential predictive factors were determined by means of a multivariate logistic regression equation applied to a cohort consisting of 60% of the patients. Points were assigned to significant parameters to generate the score. It was then internally validated with the remaining 40% of patients and was externally validated using an independent multicenter cohort of 1369 patients. Results. The overall rates of bacteremia were 12%-16% in the cohorts. The clinical probability estimate of developing bacteremia was based on 6 variables: liver disease, pleuritic pain, tachycardia, tachypnea, systolic hypotension, and absence of prior antibiotic treatment. For the score, 1 point was assigned to each predictive factor. In the derivation cohort, a cutoff score of 2 best identified the risk of bacteremia. In the validation cohorts, rates of bacteremia were <8% for patients with a score 1 (43%-49% of patients), whereas blood culture results were positive in 14%-63% of cases for patients with a score 2. Conclusions. This clinical score, based on readily available and objective variables, provides a useful tool to predict bacteremia. The score has been internally and externally validated and may be useful to guide diagnostic decisions for community-acquired pneumonia.

PMID: 19555286 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Link to Abstract at PubMed

Share


Tags: Clin Infect Dis

0 responses so far ↓

  • There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.

Discuss this article