Virtual Journal Club

Please note: This website is for discussion purposes only. The information provided at this website is not intended to provide treatment advice, or to diagnose or treat any medical disorder. The creator of this website is not responsible for events that occur as a result of decisions made based on the information presented here.

Citations powered by PubMed

Impact of point-of-care testing in the emergency department evaluation and treatment of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes.

July 22nd, 2008 · Start a Discussion

Related Articles

Impact of point-of-care testing in the emergency department evaluation and treatment of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes.

Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Mar;15(3):216-24

Authors: Renaud B, Maison P, Ngako A, Cunin P, Santin A, Hervé J, Salloum M, Calmettes MJ, Boraud C, Lemiale V, Grégo JC, Debacker M, Hémery F, Roupie E

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of point-of-care testing (POCT) for troponin I (cTnI) measurement on the time to anti-ischemic therapy (TAIT) for patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) presenting to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, single-center trial conducted in a university-affiliated hospital. cTnI measurement of patients with suspicion of NSTE-ACS coming to the ED was randomly allocated to POCT or central hospital laboratory testing (CHLT). The authors compared patients' baseline characteristics, time to anti-ischemic therapy, and medical outcomes between the randomized groups, in all study participants and in high-risk NSTE-ACS (cTnI level >or= 0.10 microg/mL), and in those with low suspicion ACS (no chest pain and no ST deviation). RESULTS: Of the 860 patients enrolled, 113 were high-risk NSTE-ACS patients, including 53 (46.9%) allocated to POCT and 60 (53.1%) to CHLT. POCT was associated with decreased time to anti-ischemic therapy of about three-quarters of an hour, which was due to a shorter time to physician notification of cTnI level, in both all and subgroup participants. In contrast, neither ED length of stay nor medical outcomes differed between study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Point-of-care testing for cTnI measurement might be clinically relevant for ED patients with a suspicion of NSTE-ACS, particularly for high-risk patients with a low suspicion of ACS.

PMID: 18304051 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Link to Abstract at PubMed

Share


Tags: Acad Emerg Med

0 responses so far ↓

  • There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.

Discuss this article